We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 11 January 15
BDI DECLINED 8% ON WEEK; BCI LOST 31%
COALspot.com: The BDI continued its decline in the first week of this year or lost 8 pct week over week. The BDI was closed at 709 points whi ...
Friday, 09 January 15
U.S. EASTERN SPOT STEAM COAL PRICES FELL IN 2014; ROSE IN WEST - EIA
U.S. Eastern spot steam coal prices declined in 2014 compared to 2013 levels because of a decline in steam coal exports.
According to U.S. Ene ...
Friday, 09 January 15
WEEKLY U.S. COAL PRODUCTION UP AN ESTIMATED 2.2% Y-O-Y
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 17.6 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 08 January 15
INDONESIA PRESSES ON WITH HIGHER COAL ROYALTY FEE TO BOOST STATE REVENUE - JG
The Indonesian government is pressing on with its plan to raise the royalty charged to coal miners in order to increase state revenue, but the move ...
Wednesday, 07 January 15
FUEL EFFICIENT SHIPS MAKE LESS SENSE IN LOWER BUNKER PRICE MARKET, BUT FUEL COSTS ARE BOUND TO RISE AGAIN
The shipping industry entered 2015 on mixed emotions, as a relatively buoyant tanker market is met by a rather lackluster dry bulk market. Still, a ...
|
|
|
Showing 3266 to 3270 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Planning Commission, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
