We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 05 January 15
FIVE ENERGY SURPRISES FOR 2015: THE POSSIBLE AND THE IMPROBABLE - KURT COBB
The coming year is likely to be as full of surprises in the field of energy as 2014 was. We just don't know which surprises! I am not predictin ...
Monday, 05 January 15
THE SHIPPING MARKET IN 2014 AND LOOKING FORWARD - BIMCO
2014 started with plenty of optimism for a considerably better global economy and an improved shipping market. Things turned out somewhat different ...
Monday, 05 January 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FOR Q1'15 DELIVERY CLOSED US$ 0.45 HIGHER COMPARED TO Q2'15 CLOSING
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery lost US$ 0.60 per MT (-1.15%) month over month and gained US$ 0.02 (+0.04%) ...
Sunday, 04 January 15
BALTIC DRY INDEX CONTINUES ITS DECLINE IN 2015
Wish you all a very Happy New Year 2015. The last report was dated 19th Dec 2014 and due to Christmas and new year holidays no reports were publish ...
Saturday, 03 January 15
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION FELL 11.2% TO 17.6 MMST WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 17.6 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
|
|
|
Showing 3276 to 3280 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
