We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 07 January 15
2015 IS RIDDLED WITH CHALLENGES FOR THE SHIPPING SECTOR, MOST NOTABLY THE DRY BULK MARKET - HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
As the new year has now set foot for real, many are still looking to detect what’s in store for the various shipping markets, with the first ...
Tuesday, 06 January 15
SHIPPING MUST ADOPT CAN-DO ATTITUDE IN 2015 - MOORE STEPHENS
Shipping needs to adopt a can-do attitude in order to successfully meet the challenges which are likely to come its way in 2015.
Shipping part ...
Tuesday, 06 January 15
Q4' 15 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED 1.81% HIGHER COMPARED TO Q1' 15 CLOSING
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has lost US$ 0.74 (-1.51%) m ...
Tuesday, 06 January 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS LOST W-O-W AND M-O-M, SGX DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has lost US$ 3.52 (-5. ...
Monday, 05 January 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS GAINED WEEK OVER WEEK, SGX DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased by US$ 2.50 (-4.02%) month over month and gained US$ 0.20 ( ...
|
|
|
Showing 3271 to 3275 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Australian Coal Association
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The University of Queensland
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
