We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 13 January 15
Q2 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP DECLINED 8.66% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery declined by US$ 3.48 (-5.73%) month over month and US$ 2.35 (-3.94%) week ...
Tuesday, 13 January 15
Q1' 2015 RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN Q2 & Q4 2015 SWAPS
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has lost US$ 7.21 ...
Monday, 12 January 15
COAL: LOW PRICES ARE EXPECTED TO DRIVE A SUPPLY-DRIVEN RECOVERY IN THE MEDIUM TERM - SGX
COALspot.com: Thermal coal prices dropped to six-year lows in 2014 driven by persistent oversupply, SGX says in its “ Commodities 2014 - A ye ...
Monday, 12 January 15
FREIGHT MARKET: 2015 FLEET SUPPLY GROWTH IS EXPECTED TO REMAIN SLIGHTLY AHEAD OF CARGO GROWTH - SGX
COALspot.com: The dry bulk freight market was forced to digest a number of negatives in 2014 leading the Baltic Dry Index to fall 66% through the y ...
Monday, 12 January 15
SHIPPING - CHALLENGES AND RESOLUTIONS - EVA TZIMA
Last year has without a doubt been another challenging one both for both our industry and our country. As Greece is currently dominated by election ...
|
|
|
Showing 3261 to 3265 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Australian Coal Association
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- White Energy Company Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
