We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 January 15
MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
In Oil we trust! The Barrel price has declined by almost a third in comparison to the 2014 January and has being on the downhill since early last s ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
COMMODITIES AREN'T PRIMED FOR A REBOUND DURING 2015: SHIPPING COULD BENEFIT FROM LOWER PRICES - ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
In the recent past, higher commodity prices were driven by an increase in demand from developing countries, which spelled good news for ship owners ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q1 DELIVERY CLOSED AT US$ 46.97 PMT
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has fell US$ 1.53 (-3.15 ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
Q4' 15 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP CLOSED 4.51% LOWER COMPARED TO Q1' 15 PRICE
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery lost US$ 1.56 per MT (-3.0%) month over month and US$ 1.03 (-2.0%) week ove ...
Tuesday, 13 January 15
MORE PITFALLS FOR OWNERS LOOKING TO TERMINATE FOR UNPAID HIRE - INCE & CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is a debatable point whether or not the obligation to pay hire under a time charter is a condition of the contract or ...
|
|
|
Showing 3256 to 3260 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Australian Coal Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- The University of Queensland
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
