We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 26 January 23
AUSTRALIA'S CORONADO GLOBAL SEES COAL PRICES RISING ON RESUMING CHINA IMPORTS - REUTERS
Australia’s Coronado Global Resources said on Tuesday resuming metallurgical coal imports to China would likely push sea-borne coal prices hi ...
Monday, 23 January 23
CHINA'S MAJOR COAL-PRODUCING PROVINCE ACCELERATES DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION - XINHUA
At Chindata Group’s big-data industrial park in Lingqiu County of Datong City, hundreds of thousands of servers are running round-the-clock t ...
Monday, 23 January 23
CHINA'S COAL-RICH PROVINCE SEES COAL PRODUCTION INCREASE IN 2022 - XINHUA
North China’s coal-rich province of Shanxi saw its coal production hit 1.31 billion tonnes in 2022, up 8.7 percent year on year, local author ...
Wednesday, 18 January 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
From Feb 5, another price cap will be introduced to Russian fuels and oil products, adding to the one for crude oil, already in place from Dec. 3. ...
Tuesday, 17 January 23
FRAUD IS THE BIGGEST THREAT TO CARGO LOSSES - TT CLUB
The almost exclusive use of online facilities to process business transactions allows a myriad of fraudulent pursuits to find opportunities within ...
|
|
|
Showing 146 to 150 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
|
| |
| |
|
