We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 08 January 23
ELEVATED COAL PRICE A DRAG ON MARGINS OF DOMESTIC BASE METAL PLAYERS: ICRA
The increased price of coal continue to be a drag on the margin of domestic base metal players with no immediate relief in sight, rating agency ICR ...
Monday, 02 January 23
CHINA’S COAL CONSUMPTION TO PEAK BY 2035: REPORT - REUTERS
China’s primary energy consumption is likely to peak at nearly 6.03 billion tonnes of standard coal between 2030 and 2035, refining giant Chi ...
Thursday, 29 December 22
INDIA'S COAL DEMAND LIKELY TO PEAK BETWEEN 2030-2035: MINISTER - ANI
The demand for coal in India will continue and is likely to peak between 2030-2035, Union Minister of Coal, Mines, and Parliamentary Affairs Pralha ...
Thursday, 29 December 22
RIO TINTO AND PARTNERS COULD RECEIVE AS MUCH AS $450M IN GOVERNMENT COMPENSATION FOR COAL PRICE CAP - THE GUARDIAN
Compensation payments for the Gladstone power plant remain the sticking point in the federal government’s coal price cap compensation negotia ...
Wednesday, 28 December 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) published a Global Trade Update on December 13th highlighting that global trade wou ...
|
|
|
Showing 156 to 160 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The University of Queensland
- Parliament of New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PTC India Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
|
| |
| |
|
