We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 January 23
CHINA'S SHANXI TARGETS 2023 COAL PRODUCTION OF NEARLY 1.37B TONS - XINHUA
China’s coal-rich province of Shanxi has set a coal production target of nearly 1.37 billion metric tons for 2023, according to a government ...
Tuesday, 17 January 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Rumor has it that the New Year has come, to set the pace in, for Russia to continue hostilities against Ukraine. Ten months on the go, into Russia& ...
Tuesday, 17 January 23
INDONESIA IS ACCOUNTING FOR 32.3% OF THE GLOBAL SEABORNE COAL MARKET IN 2022 - BENCHERO COSTA
After a slow start in the first quarter, global coal trade has really picked up pace last year, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels, Benchero ...
Tuesday, 10 January 23
INDONESIAN HBA IS SEEING A SPIKE IN JANUARY 2023 INSTEAD OF A SIGNIFICANT FALL IN DECEMBER 2022
COALspot.com: Indonesian Coal Price Reference up 8.43% in January 2023.
HBA is seeing a dramatic spike in January 2023 i ...
Sunday, 08 January 23
INDIAN COAL POWER PLANTS SHOULD BE COMPENSATED FOR 2022 FORCED GENERATION – REGULATOR : REUTERS
Indian power plants that rely on imported coal should be fully compensated when forced to supply electricity, the country’s power regulator s ...
|
|
|
Showing 151 to 155 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
|
| |
| |
|
