We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 18 February 23
PAKISTAN PLANS TO QUADRUPLE DOMESTIC COAL-FIRED POWER, MOVE AWAY FROM GAS - REUTERS
Pakistan plans to quadruple its domestic coal-fired capacity to reduce power generation costs and will not build new gas-fired plants in the coming ...
Saturday, 18 February 23
2023 MARINE FUEL MARKET PREDICTIONS - JOHN BERGMAN, AURAMARINE
The drive for decarbonisation we witnessed in 2022 has continued into 2023, demonstrating the shipping’s industry positive strides in the fas ...
Saturday, 28 January 23
COAL GROWTH BLIP NOT TO BE REPEATED - BALTIC EXCHANGE
As 2022 drew to a close, global coal demand looked set to end the year just 1.2% up on the previous year. But that small increase was enough to pus ...
Thursday, 26 January 23
CHINA'S COAL OUTPUT INCREASES IN DECEMBER 2022 - XINHUA
China’s raw coal output posted stable expansion in December 2022, official data showed.
The country produced 400 million tonne ...
Thursday, 26 January 23
COKING COAL NARROWS THE GAP ON THERMAL AS CHINA REOPENS - REUTERS
The premium of high-grade thermal coal over coking coal in Asia is shrinking as China’s re-opening and ending of a ban on imports from Austra ...
|
|
|
Showing 141 to 145 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
