We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 02 March 23
DRY BULK MARKET: THE WAY CHINA GOES, SO GOES THE MARKET - BIMCO
We expect demand growth within the 1.5-2.5% range in 2023, driven by China’s economic recovery. Improvements in consumer sentiment should hel ...
Thursday, 02 March 23
INDIA, CHINA DEMAND BOOST LOW-RANK THERMAL COAL PRICES IN ASIA - RUSSELL, REUTERS
Signs of stronger import demand from India have arrested the decline in price of the thermal coal grades most commonly sought by the world’s ...
Thursday, 02 March 23
INDIA CHEERS THE RETURN OF ‘KING COAL’ AS INDUSTRY SEES BUOYANT FUTURE - REUTERS
India’s coal industry celebrated the return of its major conference after a three-year pandemic hiatus by presenting a bullish view of demand ...
Wednesday, 01 March 23
GEO CONNECT ASIA RETURNS IN MARCH TO ACCELERATE THE REGION’S GEOSPATIAL AND LOCATION INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES
Press Release: The third edition of GCA will be held in conjunction with Digital Construction Asia and the inaugural Drones Asia – an event d ...
Wednesday, 01 March 23
THE DECLINE IN THE COAL PRICE SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR HAS BEEN SIGNIFICANT - INTERMODAL
Last week, the front-month API2 future rose by 3.5%, but since the beginning of the year the future has fallen by 39% to $136.65/t, while the Newca ...
|
|
|
Showing 131 to 135 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- VISA Power Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
