We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 18 March 23
HEDGE TO OFFSET LNG VOLATILITY, TRADERS TOLD - BALTIC EXCHANGE
A shift in imports from Asia to Europe led to significant volatility in liquefied natural gas shipping last year, prompting industry experts to urg ...
Friday, 17 March 23
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE UP AROUND 2.17% IN MARCH 2023
COALspot.com: Indonesian Coal Price Reference up around 2.17% in March 2023.
According to the new HBA regulation No. 41.K/MB.0 ...
Saturday, 11 March 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Uncertainty over the recovery of Chinese demand, demand destruction in Europe, as well as weather conditions will pivot the LNG market this summer. ...
Wednesday, 08 March 23
INDONESIAN COAL REFERENCE PRICE FORMULA HAS OFFICIALLY CHANGED
Indonesian Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources has officially changed the guideline for determining the benchmark price for the sale of coal c ...
Thursday, 02 March 23
INDIA'S SEABORNE CRUDE OIL IMPORTS IN 2022 INCREASED BY 11.5% YOY - BANCHERO COSTA
2022 has turned out to be a very positive year for crude oil trade, despite the surging oil prices and risks of economic recession, Banchero Costa ...
|
|
|
Showing 126 to 130 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- PTC India Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
|
| |
| |
|
