We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 22 March 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The crude tanker market continues to gather momentum as we head towards the end of 1Q2023, against a backdrop of strong U.S. exports paired with a ...
Wednesday, 22 March 23
WILL LOWER GAS PRICES SPARK SWITCHING IN EUROPE AND ASIA?
Record high prices devastated demand for gas and LNG across Asia and Europe last year. But with prices falling, companies are starting to re-evalua ...
Monday, 20 March 23
NTPC MULLS 5.4 MILLION TONNES COAL IMPORT IN FIRST HALF OF 2023-24: PTI
State-run power giant NTPC is planning to import around 5.4 million tonnes of coal to meet the supply shortage during the first half 2023-24 fiscal ...
Monday, 20 March 23
S. AFRICA’S EXXARO RESOURCES SAYS COAL PRICES COOLING OFF - REUTERS
South Africa’s Exxaro Resources on Thursday posted a 28% jump in 2022 profit after seeing average coal prices surge more than 150%, but warne ...
Saturday, 18 March 23
RUSSIAN LNG EXPORTS TO EUROPE REMAIN HIGH - VESSELS VALUE
Russian LNG exports to Europe remained at very high levels in February at 3.6 million CBM, following a 13 month high in January of 4.1 million CBM. ...
|
|
|
Showing 121 to 125 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Planning Commission, India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
|
| |
| |
|
