We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 11 April 23
OIL RISES ON CHINA STIMULUS EXPECTATIONS, WEAKER DOLLAR - REUTERS
Oil prices rose on Tuesday on expectations of potential economic stimulus by China, healthy demand in the rest of Asia and a drop in U.S. crude sto ...
Sunday, 09 April 23
CHINA’S BUSINESS INCOME REBOUND POINTS TO IMPROVING ECONOMY: OFFICIAL - XINHUA
Chinese businesses have posted a strong rebound in sales revenue since the beginning of this year in the latest signal of an improving economy.
...
Sunday, 09 April 23
COAL INDIA TO BOOST SUPPLIES TO INDUSTRIES AS UTILITIES’ INVENTORIES RISE - REUTERS
Coal India Ltd will increase supplies to industries, the world’s largest coal miner said on Wednesday as fuel inventories at utilities run by ...
Thursday, 06 April 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
LNG Current Supply/Demand Dynamics
This year, LNG supply will likely exceed demand, so prices will need to decline to levels that will encourag ...
Sunday, 26 March 23
EUROPE’S RUSH TO LNG COULD TURN INTO 'WORLD’S MOST EXPENSIVE AND UNNECESSARY INSURANCE POLICY'- CNBC
Europe’s rapid buildout of liquefied natural gas infrastructure is on track to far exceed demand by the end of the decade, according to new r ...
|
|
|
Showing 111 to 115 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
