We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 16 April 23
CHINA JUGGLES FOUR MAJOR ECONOMIC CHANGES IN 2023 - WOOD MACKENZIE
Change is afoot in China. Economic growth is slowing, while rising political tensions between China and the US, coupled with global supply chain re ...
Sunday, 16 April 23
CHINA'S MARCH COAL IMPORTS JUMP TO 3-YEAR HIGH - REUTERS
China’s coal imports surged in March to their highest in any month over the past three years as utilities increased purchases on expectations ...
Sunday, 16 April 23
OPEC KEEPS WORLD OIL DEMAND GROWTH OUTLOOK UNCHANGED
The OPEC Reference Basket (ORB) declined in March by $3.43, or 4.2%, m-o-m to average $78.45/b. The ICE Brent first-month contract fell by $4.33, o ...
Sunday, 16 April 23
CHEAPER SPOT LNG PRICES TEMPT SOME ASIAN BUYERS AMID SUPPLY GAINS - REUTERS
Cheaper spot prices for liquefied natural gas (LNG) are luring price-sensitive buyers back in Asia, with China and India recording rising imports i ...
Tuesday, 11 April 23
COAL USE CLIMBS WORLDWIDE DESPITE PROMISES TO SLASH IT - AAP
The burning of coal for electricity, cement, steel and other uses went up in 2022 despite global promises to phase down the fuel that is the bigges ...
|
|
|
Showing 106 to 110 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- The University of Queensland
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
