We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 21 June 23
CHINA'S MAY COAL IMPORTS FROM AUSTRALIA RECOVER TO PRE-BAN LEVELS - REUTERS
Australian coal sales to China increased in May, as trade resumed between them even as overall coal demand weakened against an uncertain macroecono ...
Monday, 19 June 23
DROUGHT-DEPLETED HYDROPOWER DRIVES CHINA TO TURN TO COAL - REUTERS
China has leant hard on coal-fired power plants as well as wind and solar generators to make up for a shortfall in hydroelectric generation as a re ...
Monday, 19 June 23
CHINA COAL OUTPUT UP 4.2 PCT IN MAY - XINHUA
China’s raw coal output posted steady growth in May, official data showed.
The country produced 390 million tonnes of raw coal ...
Wednesday, 24 May 23
AMMONIA-FUELLED BULK CARRIERS WITHIN FIVE YEARS - BALTIC EXCHANGE
Within five years, ships powered by clean ammonia could be a feature on the iron ore trade routes between West Australia and East Asia.
A study ...
Tuesday, 23 May 23
CHINA'S APRIL COAL OUTPUT LEAPS 11% ON YEAR, BUT DEMAND DOWNTURN LOOMS - REUTERS
China’s daily coal output in April jumped 11% from the same month a year earlier, boosted by Beijing’s order to increase supply to ensu ...
|
|
|
Showing 96 to 100 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
