We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 17 July 23
APPROVED AMMONIA-FUELED CONTAINERSHIP - BENEFITS AND RISKS: REED SMITH
Following the news in Offshore Energy that Korea Maritime Consultants has secured approval in principle from the American Bureau of Shipping for it ...
Friday, 14 July 23
CLEAN COAL USE KEY TO DEEP CUTS IN EMISSIONS, STABLE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY - CHINA DAILY
China must push for the clean use of coal and step up integration of the dirty fuel with carbon capture, utilization and storage to achieve sustain ...
Thursday, 13 July 23
VIETNAM'S COAL EMISSIONS PRIMED FOR SURGE AFTER IMPORTS JUMP - REUTERS
Vietnam’s thermal power emissions are primed for a steep climb this summer after the country’s imports of thermal coal soared to their ...
Monday, 26 June 23
COAL PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION UP IN 2022 - EUROSTAT
In 2022, EU coal production and consumption continued to increase, reaching 349 million tonnes (+5% compared with the previous year) and 454 millio ...
Wednesday, 21 June 23
QATAR STRIKES SECOND BIG LNG SUPPLY DEAL WITH CHINA - REUTERS
Qatar on Tuesday secured its second large gas supply deal with a Chinese state-controlled company in less than a year, putting Asia clearly ahead i ...
|
|
|
Showing 91 to 95 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- White Energy Company Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
|
| |
| |
|
