We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 09 November 23
GREEK AND CHINESE COMPANIES OWN 34% OF THE GLOBAL FLEET’S CARGO CAPACITY - BIMCO
“The global fleet of cargo carrying ships consists of around 61,000 ships with a deadweight capacity of about 2,200 million tonnes. The ships ...
Monday, 23 October 23
CHINA SEPT COAL OUTPUT HITS SIX-MONTH HIGH ON RISING POWER DEMAND - REUTERS
China’s September coal output rose 0.4% from August to the highest level since March, official data showed on Wednesday, on rising power dema ...
Monday, 23 October 23
INDIA COAL INVENTORIES DROP AT FASTEST PACE IN TWO YEARS, BOOSTING IMPORTS - REUTERS
Coal inventories at Indian power plants in the first half of October fell at their fastest rate in two years, an analysis of government data showed ...
Tuesday, 19 September 23
LNG SHIPPING STOCKS: THE ASIAN GROWTH UP-INDICES
Last week, the UP World LNG Shipping Index (UPI) gained 3.81 points or 2.51%, closing at 155.85 points. This index tracks the performance of LNG sh ...
Sunday, 10 September 23
GOLDMAN SACHS PREDICTS OIL PRICE TO HIT $100 ON OPEC CUTS - YAHOO FINANCE
Oil supply cuts by Saudi Arabia and Russia could lead to Brent crude jumping as high as $107 a barrel in 2024, Goldman Sachs Commodities Research h ...
|
|
|
Showing 81 to 85 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Planning Commission, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- White Energy Company Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
