We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 10 September 23
CHINA AUGUST COAL IMPORTS OF 44.3 MLN T HIT RECORD - REUTERS
China, the world’s top coal consumer, imported 44.3 million metric tons of the fuel last month, customs data showed, the highest amount in an ...
Tuesday, 22 August 23
CHINA'S COAL PRODUCTION LOGS STEADY GROWTH IN JANUARY-JULY: XINHUA
China’s output of raw coal went up 3.6 percent year on year in the first seven months of this year, official data showed.
The ...
Sunday, 13 August 23
THE COMMODITIES FEED: LNG SUPPLY RISKS LINGER - ING
Energy – OPEC sees deficit over remainder of 2023
Oil prices came under some pressure yesterday with ICE Brent settling a litt ...
Wednesday, 09 August 23
COAL TRADE TO RETURN TO 2019 LEVELS - BALTIC EXCHANGE
The International Energy Agency’s mid-year Coal Market Update for 2023 brings both positive and concerning news for the global coal industry. ...
Sunday, 23 July 23
ANALYSIS-INDIA'S COAL MINING BET STUMBLES AS WARY BANKS WEIGH RISING RISKS - REUTERS
India’s drive to ramp up coal output to meet growing energy demand is faltering due to banks’ reluctance to finance newly auctioned min ...
|
|
|
Showing 86 to 90 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Coal Association
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- White Energy Company Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
