We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 14 November 23
CHINA'S BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE TURNS AWAY FROM COAL - WOOD MACKENZIE
Ambitious, contentious and big spending, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is 10 years old. In that time, China has splashed more than U ...
Friday, 10 November 23
THE COMMODITIES FEED: OIL UNDER PRESSURE - ING
Energy – Brent plummets
The oil market came under significant pressure yesterday. ICE Brent settled 4.19% lower on the day and ...
Friday, 10 November 23
COAL USE AT U.S. POWER PLANTS CONTINUES DOWNWARD SPIRAL; FULL IMPACT ON MINES TO BE FELT IN 2024 - IEEFA
This year, the use of coal by the U.S.’s power producers has been so anemic that the fuel has not achieved a 20% market share in any month so ...
Friday, 10 November 23
INDIA: NATIONAL COAL INDEX RISES 3.83 POINTS IN SEPTEMBER AMID HIGHER DEMAND - LIVEMINT
The National Coal Index (NCI) rose 3.83 points to 143.91 in September amid growing demand for coal.
The union coal ministry on Tuesd ...
Thursday, 09 November 23
WE'RE PRODUCING TOO MUCH COAL, OIL AND GAS, REPORT SAYS - WSJ
World leaders pledged in 2015 to reduce emissions in a combined effort to limit climate change.
Now they are stepping up production ...
|
|
|
Showing 76 to 80 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Australian Coal Association
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PTC India Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
