We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 22 November 23
INDIA: GOVERNMENT PLANS 1.4 BILLION TONNE COAL OUTPUT BY 2027 - LIVEMINT
The Union coal ministry on Monday announced plans to increase India’s coal production to 1.404 billion tonne by 2027, with an eye to further ...
Wednesday, 22 November 23
OBLIGATION. INDONESIA AIMS TO START COLLECTING LEVIES FROM COAL MINERS IN JANUARY - REUTERS
Indonesia plans to start collecting levies from coal miners in January to be used to compensate miners who sell coal to the state utility at lower ...
Tuesday, 21 November 23
INDIAN COAL POWER PLANTS’ CAPACITY UTILISATION WILL IMPROVE TO 65% THIS FISCAL: - CRISIL
Coal-based thermal power units’ plant load factor (PLF) or capacity utilisation will improve to 65 percent in the current fiscal year despite ...
Tuesday, 14 November 23
CAPITAL PRODUCT PARTNERS L.P. ANNOUNCES TRANSFORMATIVE TRANSACTION INCLUDING THE ACQUISITION OF 11 NEWBUILD LNG CARRIERS FOR $3.1 BILLION
Capital Product Partners L.P. announced that it has entered into an umbrella agreement (the “Umbrella Agreement”) with Capital Maritime ...
Tuesday, 14 November 23
COAL INDIA BEATS Q2 PROFIT VIEW ON HIGH POWER DEMAND AMID WEAK MONSOON - REUTERS
Coal India on Friday reported better-than-expected second-quarter profit, helped by high power demand and boosted production amid a weak monsoon.
...
|
|
|
Showing 71 to 75 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- White Energy Company Limited
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The University of Queensland
|
| |
| |
|
