We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 05 January 24
BANGLADESH’S 2023 COAL-FIRED POWER OUTPUT TRIPLED, EASING SHORTAGES - REUTERS
Bangladesh nearly tripled its coal-fired power output in 2023, a Reuters analysis of government data showed, helping it tide over the worst power s ...
Tuesday, 02 January 24
COAL TRADE CONTINUES TO HEAD EAST - BALTIC EXCHANGE
The global coal trade, once concentrated in the Pacific and Atlantic basins, is undergoing a significant transformation, as highlighted in the Inte ...
Tuesday, 02 January 24
COAL CARGOES: AVOIDING EXPLOSION AND SELF-HEATING - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Despite its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, global coal consumption climbed to an all-time high in 2022 and is ...
Tuesday, 02 January 24
SINOPEC FORECASTS CHINA’S COAL CONSUMPTION TO PEAK AROUND 2025 - REUTERS
China Petrochemical Corp, or Sinopec, expects coal consumption to peak around 2025 at 4.37 billion metric tons, the state energy group said in an o ...
Thursday, 07 December 23
CHINA TO SET UP COAL PRODUCTION RESERVE TO STABILISE PRICES - REUTERS
China will establish a back-up coal production system by 2027 to stabilise prices and secure coal supply, the state planner said on Wednesday, even ...
|
|
|
Showing 61 to 65 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Australian Coal Association
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- MS Steel International - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PTC India Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
|
| |
| |
|
