We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 26 February 23
MAWANI AND JEDDAH CHAMBER SIGN AN AGREEMENT TO BUILD INTEGRATED LOGISTICS PARK
Press Release: The Saudi Ports Authority (Mawani) and Jeddah Chamber of Commerce and Industry have today inked an agreement to set up an integrated ...
Saturday, 25 February 23
INDONESIA IS STILL BY FAR THE TOP SUPPLIER OF COAL TO CHINA - BANCHERO COSTA
After a slow start in the first quarter, global coal trade has really picked up pace last year, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels, said ban ...
Wednesday, 22 February 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The short-term outlook of the global soybean market is currently pivoted by a combination of weather patterns that are affecting the harvest progre ...
Saturday, 18 February 23
OIL UNLIKELY TO BREAK ABOVE $100/BBL THIS YEAR, J.P.MORGAN SAYS –- REUTERS
Brent oil prices are unlikely to breach the $100 a barrel level this year, barring any significant geopolitical drivers, with OPEC+ potentially add ...
Saturday, 18 February 23
CHINA'S COAL PRICES FALL TO 1 YR-LOW, CLOUDING DEMAND AND IMPORT OUTLOOK - REUTERS
China’s thermal coal prices hit their lowest levels in a year this week on rising inventories as domestic mine production is recovering faste ...
|
|
|
Showing 136 to 140 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Australian Coal Association
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
