We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 19 December 22
ENERGY CRISIS FUELS COAL COMEBACK IN GERMANY - REUTERS
Coal has made a comeback in Germany this year, as Europe’s largest economy turns to the dirty fuel to power it through an energy crisis.
...
Thursday, 15 December 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
While observing the ship repair market very close to the end of the year, we are confident that shipyards worldwide are entering a new era. The nex ...
Tuesday, 13 December 22
STRONG COAL PRICES SUPPORT ROBUST EARNINGS AT INDONESIAN COAL MINERS - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings expects cash flow generation at Indonesian coal miners to remain strong in 2023, based on its forecast for coal prices to remain high ...
Tuesday, 13 December 22
BIMCO CII CLAUSE FINALLY RELEASED: DOES IT MAKE ANY SENSE OF CCI? - WFW
WHAT IS CII?
The new International Maritime Organisation’s (“IMO’s”) Carbon Intensity Indicator (“CII”) cer ...
Tuesday, 13 December 22
COAL BASE RAMPS UP ENERGY SUPPLY FOR WINTER NEEDS - XINHUA
Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China’s leading coal production base, has kicked its production into high gear to meet heating needs as col ...
|
|
|
Showing 166 to 170 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Planning Commission, India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
|
| |
| |
|
