We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 25 January 24
THE RED SEA ESCALATION IMPLICATIONS ON GLOBAL SEABORNE TRADE - MARIA BERTZELETOU
In recent days, discussions have intensified about the potential impact on the seaborne trade and ton-miles due to the evolving dynamics of market ...
Thursday, 25 January 24
RED SEA SHIPPING DISRUPTIONS KEEP GEOPOLITICAL PREMIUM FOR COMMODITIES - FITCH RATINGS
Shipping disruptions and re-routing away from the Red Sea will maintain the geopolitical premium in the main commodity markets, including for oil a ...
Friday, 19 January 24
INDONESIA TARGETS 710 MLN METRIC TONS COAL OUTPUT IN 2024 AFTER RECORD 2023 - REUTERS
Indonesia, a major thermal coal exporter, aims to produce 710 million metric tons of coal in 2024, its mining minister said on Monday, after postin ...
Friday, 19 January 24
DRUMMOND COLOMBIA COAL OUTPUT ROSE 7.1% IN 2023 - REUTERS
Coal production from miner Drummond’s Colombia operations rose 7.1% in 2023 to 29.5 million metric tons, while exports declined by 2.6% to 27 ...
Friday, 19 January 24
CHINA'S 2023 COAL OUTPUT HITS RECORD HIGH - REUTERS
China’s coal output reached a record high in 2023, data from the statistics bureau showed on Wednesday, amid an ongoing focus on energy secur ...
|
|
|
Showing 51 to 55 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
