We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 25 January 24
THE RED SEA ESCALATION IMPLICATIONS ON GLOBAL SEABORNE TRADE - MARIA BERTZELETOU
In recent days, discussions have intensified about the potential impact on the seaborne trade and ton-miles due to the evolving dynamics of market ...
Thursday, 25 January 24
RED SEA SHIPPING DISRUPTIONS KEEP GEOPOLITICAL PREMIUM FOR COMMODITIES - FITCH RATINGS
Shipping disruptions and re-routing away from the Red Sea will maintain the geopolitical premium in the main commodity markets, including for oil a ...
Friday, 19 January 24
INDONESIA TARGETS 710 MLN METRIC TONS COAL OUTPUT IN 2024 AFTER RECORD 2023 - REUTERS
Indonesia, a major thermal coal exporter, aims to produce 710 million metric tons of coal in 2024, its mining minister said on Monday, after postin ...
Friday, 19 January 24
DRUMMOND COLOMBIA COAL OUTPUT ROSE 7.1% IN 2023 - REUTERS
Coal production from miner Drummond’s Colombia operations rose 7.1% in 2023 to 29.5 million metric tons, while exports declined by 2.6% to 27 ...
Friday, 19 January 24
CHINA'S 2023 COAL OUTPUT HITS RECORD HIGH - REUTERS
China’s coal output reached a record high in 2023, data from the statistics bureau showed on Wednesday, amid an ongoing focus on energy secur ...
|
|
|
Showing 51 to 55 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The University of Queensland
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Minerals Council of Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
|
| |
| |
|
