We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 02 February 24
DRY BULK MARKET: THE DOWNWARD REVISION IN THE GROWTH OF CAPESIZE TONNE DAYS IN JANUARY WITH THE BCI DROPPING - MARIA BERTZELETOU
In the last week of January, the dry freight market sustained weakness in the Capesize segment, while the number of ballasters in the Southeast (SE ...
Friday, 02 February 24
COAL INDIA ACHIEVES NEARLY 80% OF ITS FY24 PRODUCTION TARGET IN TEN MONTHS - CNBCTV18
For the month of January, the company’s production grew by 9.1% from the same period last year to 78.4 Million Tonnes (MT), from 71.9 MT last ...
Thursday, 01 February 24
CHINA'S WIND, SOLAR CAPACITY TO OVERTAKE COAL IN 2024 - INDUSTRY BODY, REUTERS REPORTED
China’s installed wind and solar capacity is expected to overtake coal for the first time this year, according to industry forecasts.
&nb ...
Thursday, 01 February 24
ANTI-DEDUCTION CLAUSES: CAN A CHARTERER WITHHOLD HIRE WITHOUT AN OWNER'S CONSENT? - SKULD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Summary
In The Anna Dorothea, the Court found that where a charterparty provides that no deduction from hire may be m ...
Thursday, 01 February 24
INDIA REBUILDS COAL STOCKS TO ENSURE ELECTRIC RELIABILITY - REUTERS
India’s electricity supply is much more comfortable at the start of 2024 than in either 2023 or 2022 as coal production has ramped up and the ...
|
|
|
Showing 41 to 45 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- PTC India Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
