We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 02 February 24
DRY BULK MARKET: THE DOWNWARD REVISION IN THE GROWTH OF CAPESIZE TONNE DAYS IN JANUARY WITH THE BCI DROPPING - MARIA BERTZELETOU
In the last week of January, the dry freight market sustained weakness in the Capesize segment, while the number of ballasters in the Southeast (SE ...
Friday, 02 February 24
COAL INDIA ACHIEVES NEARLY 80% OF ITS FY24 PRODUCTION TARGET IN TEN MONTHS - CNBCTV18
For the month of January, the company’s production grew by 9.1% from the same period last year to 78.4 Million Tonnes (MT), from 71.9 MT last ...
Thursday, 01 February 24
CHINA'S WIND, SOLAR CAPACITY TO OVERTAKE COAL IN 2024 - INDUSTRY BODY, REUTERS REPORTED
China’s installed wind and solar capacity is expected to overtake coal for the first time this year, according to industry forecasts.
&nb ...
Thursday, 01 February 24
ANTI-DEDUCTION CLAUSES: CAN A CHARTERER WITHHOLD HIRE WITHOUT AN OWNER'S CONSENT? - SKULD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Summary
In The Anna Dorothea, the Court found that where a charterparty provides that no deduction from hire may be m ...
Thursday, 01 February 24
INDIA REBUILDS COAL STOCKS TO ENSURE ELECTRIC RELIABILITY - REUTERS
India’s electricity supply is much more comfortable at the start of 2024 than in either 2023 or 2022 as coal production has ramped up and the ...
|
|
|
Showing 41 to 45 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- The University of Queensland
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
|
| |
| |
|
