We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 31 January 24
CHINA'S INNER MONGOLIA COAL OUTPUT HIT 1.21B TONS IN 2023 - XINHUA
North China’s Inner Mongolia autonomous region churned out 1.21 billion tons of coal in 2023 as it strives to guarantee the country’s e ...
Wednesday, 31 January 24
GAS EXPORTS COST U.S. CONSUMERS MORE THAN $100 BILLION OVER 16-MONTH PERIOD - IEEFA
Limited Demand Growth Could Dampen the Dry Bulk Market in the Coming Months BIMCOStarting in late 2021—before its invasion of Ukraine—R ...
Tuesday, 30 January 24
LIMITED DEMAND GROWTH COULD DAMPEN THE DRY BULK MARKET IN THE COMING MONTHS - BIMCO
Demand
In our base scenario, we expect cargo demand to grow by 0-1% in 2024 and 0.5-1.5% in 2025. This is a 0.5 percentage point reduction for ...
Friday, 26 January 24
RED SEA DIVERSIONS ADD NEARLY A MILLION DOLLARS PER VOYAGE TO SHIPPING COSTS WHILE DOUBLING TRANSIT TIME - LSEG
The incremental costs of diverting a tanker from Asia to NW Europe via the Cape of Good Hope is accounting for an extra $932,905 USD per voyage whi ...
Friday, 26 January 24
HARD COAL GUARDIAN ANGEL OF THE ENERGY SUPPLY - GERMANY COAL IMPORTERS ASSOCIATION
- No security of supply without hard coal
- The Substitute Power Plant Provision Act (EKBG) must be extended
- Higher grid fees due to the ...
|
|
|
Showing 46 to 50 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
|
| |
| |
|
