We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 08 January 24
KOSPO TO BUY 80000 MT OF INDONESIAN LOW CALORIFIC VALUE COAL FOR FEB 2024
Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. (KOSPO), is inviting bids for the supply of Indonesian Low Calorific Value Coal from qualified suppliers for Korean ...
Monday, 08 January 24
SEABORNE TRADE REACHES 12.4BN TONNES - CLARKSONS
China will establish a back-up coal production system by 2027 to stabilise prices and secure coal supply, the state planner said on Wednesday, even ...
Monday, 08 January 24
CAPESIZES START THE NEW YEAR ON POSITIVE NOTE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
Capesize
This week the capsize market has been marked by a mix of activities and challenges. Despite a slow start following the Christmas and N ...
Friday, 05 January 24
MORGAN STANLEY SEES LOWER OIL PRICES IN 2024 ON OVERSUPPLY CONCERNS - REUTERS
Morgan Stanley sees Brent crude prices anchored near $80 per barrel in the first half in 2024 before declining towards the end of the year as it ex ...
Friday, 05 January 24
INDIA'S COAL OUTPUT RISES NEARLY 11 PC IN DEC TO 92.87 MT - PTI
India’s coal production increased by 10.75 per cent to 92.87 million tonne in December 2023 as compared to the year-ago period, an official s ...
|
|
|
Showing 56 to 60 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Australian Coal Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- The University of Queensland
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
|
| |
| |
|