We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 27 January 15
Q1 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $ 47.87 FOR WEEK ENDING JAN. 23
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 gain week over week and declined month on month.
The Q1 swap has decline US$ 0.9 ...
Tuesday, 27 January 15
Q2 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP UP 4.5% W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.28 per MT (-0.54%) month over month and increased US$ 1.23 ( ...
Monday, 26 January 15
OVERSUPPLY, AMPLE STOCKPILES, AND LACKLUSTER UNDERLYING STEEL DEMAND KEPT COKING COAL PRICES LOW IN 2014
COALspot.com: Coking coal prices (FOB & CFR) fell 15% and 18% respectively during the year, amidst persistent oversupply, ample inventory and s ...
Monday, 26 January 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY Q2 COAL SWAP CLOSED LOWER THAN Q1 CLOSING
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1' 2015 declined month over month and day on day.
The Q1 swap has fell ...
Monday, 26 January 15
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CONTINUE TO SLIDE M-O-M; ROSE W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.79 (-1.33%) per MT month over month and gained US$ 2.10&nb ...
|
|
|
Showing 3231 to 3235 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
|
| |
| |
|
