We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 21 January 15
SHIFT IN INTERNATIONAL COAL TRADE TO THE PACIFIC BASIN WILL CONTINUE - IMF
COALspot.com: The shift in international coal trade to the Pacific Basin will continue, IMF said in its latest Medium-Term Coal Market Report.
...
Wednesday, 21 January 15
MARKET INSIGHT - VASSILIS LOGOTHETIS, INTERMODAL
The World Bank has lowered its forecast for global growth in 2015 to 3% down from its previous level of 3.4% amid rising concerns over the economic ...
Wednesday, 21 January 15
THERMAL COAL PRICE OUTLOOK DEPENDENT ON INDIAN IMPORT DEMAND - MATTHEW BOYLE, CRU
COALspot.com: Supply and demand side developments in India will be an important determinant of future market dynamics and prices for thermal coal a ...
Wednesday, 21 January 15
PORT OF NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS JUMP 16.19% ON MONTH TO 15.80 MIL MT IN DECEMBER' 14
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port, has shipped $1.136 billi ...
Tuesday, 20 January 15
INDIA TO SURPASS THE UNITED STATES AND BECOME THE SECOND-LARGEST COAL CONSUMER IN THE WORLD BY 2019 - IMF
COALspot.com: In 2013, coal added more primary energy than any other fuel and was the fastest-growing fossil fuel, enhancing its position as the se ...
|
|
|
Showing 3241 to 3245 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Planning Commission, India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
