We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 25 January 15
PANAMAX FREIGHT RATES STILL FALLING
COALspot.com: The BDI was slightly down this week to 720 points. The BDI lost 2.83 pct week on week.
The cape index continued its upward trend ...
Friday, 23 January 15
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION FOR WEEK ENDING JAN. 17 UP 2.5%
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.4 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 22 January 15
PANAMAX: A SOFTER TONE AND OVERALL A SLUGGISH MARKET - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The handy and supra market has experienced yet another week with slow activity and softening rates in both hemispheres, broker Fearnleys AS ...
Thursday, 22 January 15
BUMI RESOURCES POSTS NET INCOME OF $13.3 MILLION 9M-2014
COALspot.com: Bumi Resources, Indonesia’s largest coal miner, reported today that, the company has recorded a net income of $13.3 million for ...
Wednesday, 21 January 15
PANAMAX MARKET MOVED SIDEWAYS OVERALL LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The positive sentiment in which the week prior ended carried on through-out last week as well, the end of which marked the first posi ...
|
|
|
Showing 3236 to 3240 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
