We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 02 February 15
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP PICKS UP W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.81 (-1.36%) per MT month over month and gained US$ 0.18&nb ...
Monday, 02 February 15
SOUTH KOREA'S KOMIPO INVITES BIDS FOR 280K MT OF SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender to buy total 280,000 MT of Sub-bituminous coal coa ...
Sunday, 01 February 15
INDONESIA-TO-INDIA COAL FREIGHT RATES REMAIN WEAK NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI continued its fall reached lowest levels since 1986 this week.
The BDI declined 15.55 pct to 608 points on Friday 30, Ja ...
Friday, 30 January 15
CONTANGO AND TANKERS - SKULD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Like an invitation to a dance, the word contango may have some people flustered, but for tanker owners this market phenome ...
Friday, 30 January 15
U.S. YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION REACHED 65.7 MMST
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
|
|
|
Showing 3221 to 3225 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
