We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 02 February 15
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP PICKS UP W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.81 (-1.36%) per MT month over month and gained US$ 0.18&nb ...
Monday, 02 February 15
SOUTH KOREA'S KOMIPO INVITES BIDS FOR 280K MT OF SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender to buy total 280,000 MT of Sub-bituminous coal coa ...
Sunday, 01 February 15
INDONESIA-TO-INDIA COAL FREIGHT RATES REMAIN WEAK NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI continued its fall reached lowest levels since 1986 this week.
The BDI declined 15.55 pct to 608 points on Friday 30, Ja ...
Friday, 30 January 15
CONTANGO AND TANKERS - SKULD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Like an invitation to a dance, the word contango may have some people flustered, but for tanker owners this market phenome ...
Friday, 30 January 15
U.S. YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION REACHED 65.7 MMST
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
|
|
|
Showing 3221 to 3225 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Australian Coal Association
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
