We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 04 February 15
MARKET INSIGHT - LINOS KOGEVINAS
It has been just about over 2 months since, in a move that surprised many and caused widespread apprehension, OPEC decided to maintain its producti ...
Tuesday, 03 February 15
Q1'15 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED $ 3.29 HIGHER COMPARED TO Q4'15 DELIVERY PRICE
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 rose week over week and month on month.
The Q1 swap up US$ 0.68 (+1.41%) month o ...
Tuesday, 03 February 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FOR Q4 DELIVERY CLOSED 5.86% LOWER THAN Q1 PRICE
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 0.26 per MT (+0.51%) week over week and declined US$ 0.02 (-0.04%) ...
Monday, 02 February 15
API 4 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP ROSE WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1' 2015 declined month over month and day on day.
The Q1 swap has decli ...
Monday, 02 February 15
INDONESIA'S ADARO ENERGY PRODUCED 56.21 MILLION TONNES OF COAL IN 2014; UP 8% Y-O-Y
COALspot.com: PT. Adaro Energy, Indonesia’s largest coal producer, has increased coal production by 8% to 56.21 million tonnes (Mt) from both ...
|
|
|
Showing 3216 to 3220 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
|
| |
| |
|
