We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 21 March 14
MERCURIA ANNOUNCES ACQUISITION OF J.P. MORGAN PHYSICAL COMMODITIES BUSINESS
COALspot.com: Mercuria Energy Group announced that it has reached a definitive agreement with J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. to acquire its physica ...
Thursday, 20 March 14
CAPESIZE: WEST AUSTRALIA TO CHINA RATES HAVE CLIMBED BACK TOWARD USD 11 PMT - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
From a slight improvement in the Atlantic to a more mixed picture this mid week. North Atlantic rounds showing softening signs whereas S ...
Wednesday, 19 March 14
INSTEAD OF DECIDING WHETHER THE GLASS IS HALF FULL OR HALF EMPTY, I AM CURRENTLY GLAD THERE IS WATER IN THE GLASS - EVA TZIMA
By Eva Tzima
Research Analyst
Intermodal Research & Valuations
Right when you think that you have all your facts straight, right wh ...
Wednesday, 19 March 14
EUROCOKE SUMMIT 2014
Press Release: ThyssenKrupp, Steel Institute VDEh, SSI and more headline Smithers Apex’s Eurocoke Summit
The leading coke, coal and s ...
Wednesday, 19 March 14
DRY BULK MARKET REBOUND LEADS TO MORE NEWBUILDING ORDERS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The steady rise of the dry bulk market, as evidenced by the return, yesterday, of the Baltic Dry Index above the 1,500-point mark (1,518), is fu ...
|
|
|
Showing 3791 to 3795 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
