We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 24 March 14
SGX'S Q2'14 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSES SLIGHTLY HIGHER W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries lost 1.81 percent month on month and closed at US$ 74.82 per mt as o ...
Sunday, 23 March 14
THE COAL FREIGHT RATES SEEN SLIGHTLY FIRMING UP THIS WEEK - REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market firmed up this week. BDI was up 8.26 pct week on week and index was closed at 1599 points. The Cape index was u ...
Saturday, 22 March 14
SHIP OWNERS INVEST $15 BILLION FOR NEWBUILDINGS AND SECONDHAND VESSELS DURING FEBRUARY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Ship owners have kept on their aggressive stance in the investment scene both for newbuildings, as well as for secondhand vessels globally durin ...
Friday, 21 March 14
DRY BULK MARKET STAYS ON RECOVERY MODE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has reached new year heighs, as a result of renewed Capesize demand. The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) ended yesterday's sessio ...
Friday, 21 March 14
US COAL PRODUCTION UP 1.5%; WEST MISSISSIPPI COAL PRODUCTION DOWN 1.85% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.0 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
|
|
|
Showing 3786 to 3790 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
|
| |
| |
|
