We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 26 March 14
NEWBUILDING ORDERING ACTIVITY PICKS UP PACE ON IMPROVING DRY BULK MARKET CONDITIONS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The gradual improvement of the dry bulk market, as expected for some time now, is urging shipowners to increase their newbuilding ordering activ ...
Wednesday, 26 March 14
LARGE AMOUNT OF VESSELS CHARTERED TO HAUL IRON ORE CARGOES TO CHINESE BUYERS THIS WEEK - COMMODORE RESEARCH & CONSULTANCY
COALspot.com: Through the first three days of this week, 18 dry bulk vessels have been chartered to haul spot iron ore cargoes to Chinese buyers ...
Wednesday, 26 March 14
JOIN IN THE CLEAN COAL CASE STUDY WITH SINOPEC!
Produced by CDMC Events, The 13th Clean Coal Forum 2014 will be held on June 12,13, 2014 in Beijing, China. We are glad to invite Experts ...
Tuesday, 25 March 14
INDONESIAN SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL SWAP FOR Q2 DELIVERY CLOSED $ 57.40 PMT W/E 21 MARCH 2014
COALspot.com – Indonesia, the world’s largest exporter of the thermal coal's swaps for delivery April - June 2014 gained this pa ...
Tuesday, 25 March 14
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS JUMP 29.16% TO 2.79 MMT WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 24 March 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, total 2.79 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3781 to 3785 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Australian Coal Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
|
| |
| |
|
