We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 31 March 14
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR Q2 14 DELIVERY LOST 1.17% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries lost 1.17 percent month on month and closed at US$ 75.38 per m ...
Sunday, 30 March 14
FREIGHTS FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA IS EXPECTED TO BE SOFT NEXT WEEK - REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market dropped drastically and all sectors were affected severely.
The BDI was down by 14.13 pct and closed at 1, ...
Friday, 28 March 14
US PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY 18.9 MMST IN A WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
Friday, 28 March 14
CHINA'S ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES WILL NOT CURB GROWTH IN DOMESTIC STEEL PRODUCTION AND SEABORNE IRON ORE - WOOD MACKENZIE SAYS
Steel plants in China have been targeted as a major source of the toxic smog enveloping Beijing and Shanghai. Emergency measures have been impos ...
Thursday, 27 March 14
PANAMAX : SEEMS TO HEAD FURTHER DOWN; CAPESIZE : ANOTHER CHOPPY AND UNPREDICTABLE WEEK - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
A weaker sentiment for the smaller size as well, with reduced activity in the Atlantic where Owners have to face significantly lower ret ...
|
|
|
Showing 3776 to 3780 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Planning Commission, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
