We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 14 March 14
US, THE WORLD'S SECOND LARGEST COAL PRODUCER MINED 75.3 MMST OF COAL IN FEBRUARY; DOWN 10.88% M-M
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.7 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 13 March 14
HANDY: THE FAR EAST MARKET IS IN AN UPWARD TREND - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
Atlantic is a bit under pressure for spot tonnage, but the underlying sentiment is positive for the short medium future. 2-3 legs are do ...
Thursday, 13 March 14
MARKET INSIGHT - CHRISTOPHER T. WHITTY
By Christopher T. Whitty
Marketing Manager
Cotzias Intermodal Shipping Inc.
During the last year we have noticed that a fair number of ...
Wednesday, 12 March 14
ADARO ENERGY IMPROVES EFFICIENCY AND GENERATED STRONG EBITDA IN 2013
COALspot.com: PT Adaro Energy Tbk, Indonesia's single largest coal miner posted revenue of US$ 3.28 billion and cost of revenue of US$ 2.54 ...
Wednesday, 12 March 14
DGOMC OF INDONESIA REVISED DOWN THE BENCHMARK PRICES FOR COAL BY 4.26% IN MARCH
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia has revised down the government's declared coal bench mark price ...
|
|
|
Showing 3801 to 3805 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The University of Queensland
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|
