We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 March 14
DRY BULK VESSELS STILL THE CREAM OF THE CROP FOR SHIP OWNERS
Dry bulk carriers have remained the most popular vessel type among ship owners as proven by the sheer number of second hand vessel sales and new ...
Tuesday, 11 March 14
NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 6.98% LESS COAL WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 10 March 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, total 2 ...
Tuesday, 11 March 14
INDONESIAN SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL SWAPS CONTINUES TO FALL
COALspot.com – Indonesia, the world’s largest exporter of the thermal coal's swaps for delivery April - June 2014 slip again thi ...
Monday, 10 March 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS LOST 4.28 PERCENT MONTH ON MONTH FOR Q2 DELIVERY
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries lost 4.28 percent month on month and closed at US$ 73.97 per mt as on Fr ...
Monday, 10 March 14
THE FREIGHT MARKET WAS QUITE FIRM THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market was quite firm this past week with BDI sharply increased by 22.65 pct week on week and closed at 1543 points, while ...
|
|
|
Showing 3806 to 3810 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- The University of Queensland
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
