COALspot.com keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events


Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Thursday, 19 December 13
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE HITS THREE-YEAR HIGH - MOORE STEPHENS


Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry rose to their highest level for more than three years over the three-month period to November 2013, according to the latest Shipping Confidence Survey from international accountant and shipping adviser Moore Stephens. There was encouraging news on freight rates, and evidence of an increased willingness to invest. But concern persists on overtonnaging, operating costs, and the cost of regulation.

In November 2013, the average confidence level expressed by respondents in the markets in which they operate was 6.1 on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high), compared to the 5.9 recorded in the previous survey in August 2013. This is the highest figure since the 6.2 recorded in August 2010. The survey was launched in May 2008 with a confidence rating of 6.8.

Despite the overall improvement in confidence, owners were the only category of individual respondent to post an increase this time, from 5.8 to 6.2, the highest figure recorded since May 2010. Confidence on the part of managers, however, was down from 6.2 to 6.1, while for charterers there was a drop from 6.3 to 5.7. Geographically, confidence was down in Asia (from 6.1 to 5.9) but up in Europe (from 5.9 to 6.1) and in North America, from 6.0 to 6.6.

The mood of optimism apparent in a number of responses was typified by the respondent who noted: “We clearly see an upswing in the markets when talking to various people at various locations in the last couple of months. There is, for the first time in a long while, a general feeling of optimism. Furthermore, the economic indicators, both small and large, all over the world, are pointing in the direction of recovery. We cannot expect it to reach the same levels as in 2007/2008, but a sustainable level of confidence is much better than skyrocketing markets because the higher you climb the lower you might fall.”

Another respondent pointed out: “The light we see at the end of the tunnel is not, as had been feared, a train coming towards us. We are quietly optimistic, with supply and demand seeming to come into balance, despite concerns over the amount of new orders being placed.”

One respondent emphasised: “A growing global economy, including the US and the EU, is crucial for an improved shipping market, and there are some good signs of that at the moment, which makes us hopeful for the future.” Another remarked, “We envisage the market growing in Asia, and in Brazil and Russia, typified by increasing imports of products for use in energy projects. We also see an increase in the use of gas as an alternative energy source, with many countries developing infrastructure and facilities to facilitate distribution.”

Others were slightly more guarded, such as the respondents who noted: “The shipping market will stay more or less at current levels well into next year as the world economic situation continues to fluctuate,” and, “The shipping industry in general is very weak at present, although we do expect improvements in 2014.” Others still remained pessimistic, such as the respondent who complained, “Shipping companies are facing a number of challenges, including low market rates caused by overtonnaging in a number of sectors, slow growth in the global economy, and increases in global ship operating costs.” Another noted, “Supply remains higher than demand, with significant falls in freight rates, while operating costs are always increasing. All this means that the shipping business is no longer attractive.”

Elsewhere it was noted: “Things are still pretty fragile, and it wouldn’t take much to knock many operators back into the hole again,” and, “We think the industry is stuck where it is for another year as available tonnage waits for an uplift in world trade.”

The overriding concern on the part of respondents once more related to the levels of excess tonnage both in the market and about to enter it. “There is too much shipbuilding capacity which, coupled with the entry of new investors, will lead to a continuation in the current oversupply of tonnage and low rates,” said one respondent. Another noted: “We need to convince owners to stop building ships, especially tankers,” while another observed “There is a large surplus which is unlikely to be removed for two or three years.”

One respondent said: “Our principal concern is the perennial ability of owners to kill off improvements by increasing the supply of vessels in every sector,” while another feared, “The higher average rates we are likely to see in 2014 will be killed off by massive new deliveries in 2015.”  Yet another observed, “Owners must be disciplined when placing new orders, even if they have the luxury of using other people’s money.”

Operating costs and the cost of regulatory compliance continued to concern respondents, one of whom noted “Regulations to control emissions are commendable, and owners will have to adhere to them, but they will need financial support to compensate for the high cost of installing technologically advanced equipment to meet the requirements.” Another pointed out, “Regulatory requirements are still not fully factored into economic assessments, be they financing or investment decisions, and this will come back to haunt the industry.”

“Operating costs and the increasing cost of regulation are major factors,” noted one respondent, “and indeed the cost of additional regulation directly affects operating costs. There is a problem also with the supply of qualified crew, especially in certain niche markets, due to the ‘greying’ of the supply pool.” Another respondent simply said: “Low freight rates, high operating costs and costly regulations are killing us.”

The likelihood of respondents making a major investment or significant development over the next 12 months was up on the previous survey, on a scale of 1 to 10, from 5.5 to 5.8 which, as with overall confidence, is the highest figure recorded since August 2010. The figure for managers was up from 5.8 to its highest ever figure of 6.1, while that for owners was also up, from 5.8 to 6.0. Although charterers recorded a fall, from 6.7 to 6.4, they remain the most optimistic category of respondent in terms of the likelihood of making a new investment.

The number of managers rating the likelihood of making a new investment over the next twelve months at 7.0 out of 10.0, or higher, was up from 45 per cent to 51 per cent, while the number of owners who thought likewise was up by one percentage point from 47 per cent to 48 per cent. The percentage of charterers of like mind, however, was down from 72 per cent to 45 per cent. Geographically, expectation levels of major investments were up in both Asia and Europe, from 5.5 to 5.7 and from 5.6 to 5.8 respectively, and in North America from 5.0 to 5.8.

One respondent said: “While earnings and income are low, there is still a great deal of activity involving planning and preparing for the future, and indeed we are investing with a very positive attitude.” Another noted: “Some major owners have the funds available to acquire tonnage. But the key is timing, and too many big shipping companies are intent on looking good on paper despite the fact that they are actually drowning.”

A number of respondents referred to the increasing involvement in the industry of non-shipping investors. One said: “The risk of overcapacity in all sectors has increased now that so many non-shipping investors have discovered the shipping market”, while another noted “Over the past five years we have seen a lot of non-shipping investors enter the market, and they have now seen that shipping is not an easy business. But we are hopeful for the future, and now is certainly not the time to leave the table.”

Demand trends, competition and finance costs once again featured as the top three factors cited by respondents overall as those likely to influence performance most significantly over the coming twelve months. The overall numbers for demand trends and finance costs were down by one percentage point to 23% and 15 % respectively, while competition was unchanged at 19%. Tonnage supply (unchanged at 13%) featured in fourth place, ahead of fuel costs (static at 10%) and operating costs, another non-mover, at 9%.

Demand trends remained the number one performance-affecting factor for owners, unchanged at 25 %. Tonnage supply, meanwhile, was up one percentage point to 17% in joint-second place with finance costs, up 2 percentage points. For managers, meanwhile, competition was in first place, up 2 percentage points to 22%, the highest figure in the life of the survey. Demand trends, unchanged at 15%, featured in second place ahead of finance costs, down four percentage points to 14%.

For charterers, demand trends, although down by 7 percentage points to 26%, featured in first place, ahead of competition (up 2 percentage points to 22%), and tonnage supply, unchanged at 16%.

Geographically, demand trends were the most significant factor for respondents in Asia (up by one percentage point to 24%), Europe (down to 22% from 24%) and North America (up by 3 percentage points to 35%, the highest figure recorded since the survey was launched). Competition and finance costs, in that order, made up the top three performance-affecting factors in both Asia and Europe, while in North America it was competition and tonnage supply.

There was a one percentage-point fall (from 41% to 40%) in the number of respondents overall who expected finance costs to increase over the next 12 months. The number of respondents expecting finance costs to come down, meanwhile, fell by two percentage points to 9%, which was nevertheless still the second-highest figure recorded in this regard since August 2011. Owners were the only main category to record an increase in the numbers of respondents expecting higher finance costs (up from 36% to 41%).  The figure for brokers was down from 50% to 36%, while both managers (down from 44% to 40%) and charterers (down ten percentage points to 28%) recorded all-time survey lows in this respect.

The number of respondents in Asia anticipating an increase in the cost of finance fell by 4 percentage points to 49%, while in Europe the numbers were up from 33% to 35%. In North America, meanwhile, the numbers anticipating higher finance costs fell sharply from 57% to 33%.

One respondent said: “Financing is a big problem”, while another noted, “It is difficult to finance new projects, given unsatisfactory returns on investment and perceived risk levels on the part of banks.”

Turning to the freight markets, there was, for the second survey in succession, an increased expectation of higher rates in the tanker and dry bulk sectors. One respondent claimed, “Rates have not reached this level since October 2008.” In the container ship market, meanwhile, confidence was maintained at existing levels.

The number of respondents overall who expressed an expectation of higher rates in the tanker sector over the next twelve months was up by 5 percentage points to 43%, the highest figure since May 2011. Owners led the way, with 52% anticipating higher rates, as opposed to 37% last time. Managers’ expectations in this regard were up by one percentage point to 37%, but 40% of brokers (as opposed to 35%) thought that tanker rates were likely to go up over the coming year. Charterers, however, were of a different mind, with the number anticipating higher tanker rates falling from 43% to 36%.

Geographically, the prospects for increased tanker rates were deemed higher this time by respondents in Asia (up from 39% to 46%), in Europe (up from 36% to 40%) and in North America (up by 40 percentage points to 83%).

In the dry bulk sector, meanwhile, there was a 14 percentage-point increase, to 56%, in the overall numbers of those anticipating rate increases. This is the highest figure recorded in the life of the survey, and 100% up on the corresponding figure when the survey was launched in 2008. Managers, up by 22 percentage points to a survey high of 60%, led the way, followed by owners, up 6 percentage points to 58%, another all-time high. Even charterers, recording a 5 percentage-point increase to 47%, and brokers (up by 25 percentage points to 46%) were looking on the bright side.

Expectations of higher dry bulk rates over the next 12 months were up to all-time survey highs in both Asia and Europe, rising by 21% and 13% respectively to levels of 63% and 55%. The numbers were also up, by 8 percentage points to 64%, in North America.

One respondent said: “The dry cargo market is coming into balance and, with the new eco-ships on the way, everything looks very positive for those owners who have the right fleet profile and minimal counter-party risk.” Elsewhere, however, it was noted, “Strong dry bulk markets can only last for a very short time, making it difficult to compensate for the poor market conditions we have seen in recent years.”

In the container ship market, the numbers expecting rates to increase over the coming 12 months was unchanged at 30%. Owners’ expectations were up by 3 percentage points on last time to 30%, while optimism in this regard on the part of brokers rose from 25% to 29%.  The expectations of managers rose two percentage points to 30 per cent, while those of charterers held steady, also at 30%. Geographically, expectations of improved container ship rates were up by 3 percentage points in Asia to 36%, by 9 percentage points in North America to 44%, and unchanged in Europe at 27%.

One respondent made the extravagant claim that, “All non-operator-owned container ships need to be removed from the market, so that over-supply can be corrected.”

Moore Stephens Shipping Partner, Richard Greiner, said: “The findings of this latest survey provide more good news for the shipping industry. It is now fifteen months since we recorded a decline in shipping confidence. There is an old adage which says that confidence is contagious. If that is true, shipping certainly seems to have caught the bug.

“It was noticeable on this occasion that, in contrast to previous surveys, very few of our respondents referred to the effect that the global economic and political situation is having on their business. This does not mean, of course, that those problems have gone away. But it is a clear indication that they are perceived to be improving, to the extent that the industry is now focusing on issues closer to home, and moreover on problems where they can realistically contribute towards helping to find a solution.

“Those problems represent a significant challenge for the shipping industry. Moreover, they continue to have a familiar ring to them. There are still too many ships for the cargoes available on many trades. There is not the ready access to bank finance that many would like. Operating costs are expected to rise over the next two years, following the fall for 2012 recorded by Moore Stephens’ ship operating costs benchmark study OpCost. Crew wages are only moving in one direction. The cost of keeping up with regulatory compliance is now a big-ticket item. And P&I premiums are on the increase.

“These problems will not go away. But the prospect of being able to fund them properly is brighter now than for some time. Expectations of improved rates in the dry bulk sector are now higher than at any time in the last five years, while in the tanker market the mood is at its most bullish for two and a half years. In the container trades, things are meanwhile holding up well. In short, there should be more money about next year, although no shortage of things to spend it on.

“Some of that money will have to be spent on compliance and on increased operating costs, but there could be some over for new investment, expectations of which are running at their highest survey levels for two and a half years. That is good news, particularly when viewed together with indications of the increasing interest being shown in shipping by non-industry investors. The latter, of course, can bring problems of its own, but in principle the prospect of new money coming into shipping should be a good thing.

“Whatever the level of new money coming in, the vast majority of players who have survived the downturn of the past five years are very much old money in terms of their industry experience. They have taken the worst that can be thrown at them and are still standing. That means that they have committed to operating in a cleaner and leaner shipping industry, and to meeting the costs that go with it. Provided the evidence of improved confidence that we are seeing does not turn out to be a false dawn, they can reasonably expect to reap better rewards over the coming years than they have for some time.”
Source: Moore Stephens / Hellenic Shipping News



If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Friday, 13 December 13
DRY BULK SHIPPING TO WITNESS HEALTHY DEMAND MOVING FORWARD - ICS
The Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers Greek Branch organised its 9th Annual Forum at Eugenides Foundation, on Wednesday, 11th of December, with a r ...


Friday, 13 December 13
US PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY 18.4 MILLION SHORT TONS OF COAL W/E 7 DECEMBER 2013
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.4 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...


Thursday, 12 December 13
GREAT EXPECTATIONS SANCTIONED - EVA TZIMA
News that sanctions on Iranian oil exports could be lifted sometime in the following months have shaken the markets recently. One of the world&rsquo ...


Thursday, 12 December 13
DRY BULK MARKET RATES FOR CAPESIZES TO REMAIN VOLATILE SAYS BIMCO
The dry bulk market has reached multi year highs this week, as the BDI is standing at the 2,300-point mark. In its analysis of the market, BIMCO pre ...


Wednesday, 11 December 13
THE INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT IS CONSIDERING SETTING A REGULATION ON THE MINIMUM PURITY TO REGULATE UNPROCESSED ORE BAN
COALspot.com: Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Jero Wacik recently proposed to house those mining (mineral) companies that had shown a commitme ...


   790 791 792 793 794   
Showing 3956 to 3960 news of total 6871
News by Category
Popular News
 
Total Members : 28,691
Member
Panelist
User ID
Password
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Free
Register
Forgot Password
 
Our Members Are From ...

  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Clarksons - UK
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Electricity Authority, New Zealand
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Mitsui
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Coal India Limited
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Fearnleys - India
  • GB Group - China
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Malco - India
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Tata Power - India
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Cosco
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • TGV SRAAC LIMITED, India
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • JPower - Japan
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Indian Energy Exchange, India
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Ince & co LLP
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Vale Mozambique
  • KPCL - India
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Thriveni
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • TNPL - India
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • The University of Queensland
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • EIA - United States
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • SRK Consulting
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • Bank of America
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Platts
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • bp singapore
  • PetroVietnam
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Maersk Broker
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • World Coal - UK
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • KPMG - USA
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • UBS Singapore
  • NALCO India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • World Bank
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Enel Italy
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • WorleyParsons
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Surastha Cement
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Lafarge - France
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • APGENCO India
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India