We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 19 December 13
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE HITS THREE-YEAR HIGH - MOORE STEPHENS
Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry rose to their highest level for more than three years over the three-month period to November 2013, according to the latest Shipping Confidence Survey from international accountant and shipping adviser Moore Stephens. There was encouraging news on freight rates, and evidence of an increased willingness to invest. But concern persists on overtonnaging, operating costs, and the cost of regulation.
In November 2013, the average confidence level expressed by respondents in the markets in which they operate was 6.1 on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high), compared to the 5.9 recorded in the previous survey in August 2013. This is the highest figure since the 6.2 recorded in August 2010. The survey was launched in May 2008 with a confidence rating of 6.8.
Despite the overall improvement in confidence, owners were the only category of individual respondent to post an increase this time, from 5.8 to 6.2, the highest figure recorded since May 2010. Confidence on the part of managers, however, was down from 6.2 to 6.1, while for charterers there was a drop from 6.3 to 5.7. Geographically, confidence was down in Asia (from 6.1 to 5.9) but up in Europe (from 5.9 to 6.1) and in North America, from 6.0 to 6.6.
The mood of optimism apparent in a number of responses was typified by the respondent who noted: “We clearly see an upswing in the markets when talking to various people at various locations in the last couple of months. There is, for the first time in a long while, a general feeling of optimism. Furthermore, the economic indicators, both small and large, all over the world, are pointing in the direction of recovery. We cannot expect it to reach the same levels as in 2007/2008, but a sustainable level of confidence is much better than skyrocketing markets because the higher you climb the lower you might fall.”
Another respondent pointed out: “The light we see at the end of the tunnel is not, as had been feared, a train coming towards us. We are quietly optimistic, with supply and demand seeming to come into balance, despite concerns over the amount of new orders being placed.”
One respondent emphasised: “A growing global economy, including the US and the EU, is crucial for an improved shipping market, and there are some good signs of that at the moment, which makes us hopeful for the future.” Another remarked, “We envisage the market growing in Asia, and in Brazil and Russia, typified by increasing imports of products for use in energy projects. We also see an increase in the use of gas as an alternative energy source, with many countries developing infrastructure and facilities to facilitate distribution.”
Others were slightly more guarded, such as the respondents who noted: “The shipping market will stay more or less at current levels well into next year as the world economic situation continues to fluctuate,” and, “The shipping industry in general is very weak at present, although we do expect improvements in 2014.” Others still remained pessimistic, such as the respondent who complained, “Shipping companies are facing a number of challenges, including low market rates caused by overtonnaging in a number of sectors, slow growth in the global economy, and increases in global ship operating costs.” Another noted, “Supply remains higher than demand, with significant falls in freight rates, while operating costs are always increasing. All this means that the shipping business is no longer attractive.”
Elsewhere it was noted: “Things are still pretty fragile, and it wouldn’t take much to knock many operators back into the hole again,” and, “We think the industry is stuck where it is for another year as available tonnage waits for an uplift in world trade.”
The overriding concern on the part of respondents once more related to the levels of excess tonnage both in the market and about to enter it. “There is too much shipbuilding capacity which, coupled with the entry of new investors, will lead to a continuation in the current oversupply of tonnage and low rates,” said one respondent. Another noted: “We need to convince owners to stop building ships, especially tankers,” while another observed “There is a large surplus which is unlikely to be removed for two or three years.”
One respondent said: “Our principal concern is the perennial ability of owners to kill off improvements by increasing the supply of vessels in every sector,” while another feared, “The higher average rates we are likely to see in 2014 will be killed off by massive new deliveries in 2015.” Yet another observed, “Owners must be disciplined when placing new orders, even if they have the luxury of using other people’s money.”
Operating costs and the cost of regulatory compliance continued to concern respondents, one of whom noted “Regulations to control emissions are commendable, and owners will have to adhere to them, but they will need financial support to compensate for the high cost of installing technologically advanced equipment to meet the requirements.” Another pointed out, “Regulatory requirements are still not fully factored into economic assessments, be they financing or investment decisions, and this will come back to haunt the industry.”
“Operating costs and the increasing cost of regulation are major factors,” noted one respondent, “and indeed the cost of additional regulation directly affects operating costs. There is a problem also with the supply of qualified crew, especially in certain niche markets, due to the ‘greying’ of the supply pool.” Another respondent simply said: “Low freight rates, high operating costs and costly regulations are killing us.”
The likelihood of respondents making a major investment or significant development over the next 12 months was up on the previous survey, on a scale of 1 to 10, from 5.5 to 5.8 which, as with overall confidence, is the highest figure recorded since August 2010. The figure for managers was up from 5.8 to its highest ever figure of 6.1, while that for owners was also up, from 5.8 to 6.0. Although charterers recorded a fall, from 6.7 to 6.4, they remain the most optimistic category of respondent in terms of the likelihood of making a new investment.
The number of managers rating the likelihood of making a new investment over the next twelve months at 7.0 out of 10.0, or higher, was up from 45 per cent to 51 per cent, while the number of owners who thought likewise was up by one percentage point from 47 per cent to 48 per cent. The percentage of charterers of like mind, however, was down from 72 per cent to 45 per cent. Geographically, expectation levels of major investments were up in both Asia and Europe, from 5.5 to 5.7 and from 5.6 to 5.8 respectively, and in North America from 5.0 to 5.8.
One respondent said: “While earnings and income are low, there is still a great deal of activity involving planning and preparing for the future, and indeed we are investing with a very positive attitude.” Another noted: “Some major owners have the funds available to acquire tonnage. But the key is timing, and too many big shipping companies are intent on looking good on paper despite the fact that they are actually drowning.”
A number of respondents referred to the increasing involvement in the industry of non-shipping investors. One said: “The risk of overcapacity in all sectors has increased now that so many non-shipping investors have discovered the shipping market”, while another noted “Over the past five years we have seen a lot of non-shipping investors enter the market, and they have now seen that shipping is not an easy business. But we are hopeful for the future, and now is certainly not the time to leave the table.”
Demand trends, competition and finance costs once again featured as the top three factors cited by respondents overall as those likely to influence performance most significantly over the coming twelve months. The overall numbers for demand trends and finance costs were down by one percentage point to 23% and 15 % respectively, while competition was unchanged at 19%. Tonnage supply (unchanged at 13%) featured in fourth place, ahead of fuel costs (static at 10%) and operating costs, another non-mover, at 9%.
Demand trends remained the number one performance-affecting factor for owners, unchanged at 25 %. Tonnage supply, meanwhile, was up one percentage point to 17% in joint-second place with finance costs, up 2 percentage points. For managers, meanwhile, competition was in first place, up 2 percentage points to 22%, the highest figure in the life of the survey. Demand trends, unchanged at 15%, featured in second place ahead of finance costs, down four percentage points to 14%.
For charterers, demand trends, although down by 7 percentage points to 26%, featured in first place, ahead of competition (up 2 percentage points to 22%), and tonnage supply, unchanged at 16%.
Geographically, demand trends were the most significant factor for respondents in Asia (up by one percentage point to 24%), Europe (down to 22% from 24%) and North America (up by 3 percentage points to 35%, the highest figure recorded since the survey was launched). Competition and finance costs, in that order, made up the top three performance-affecting factors in both Asia and Europe, while in North America it was competition and tonnage supply.
There was a one percentage-point fall (from 41% to 40%) in the number of respondents overall who expected finance costs to increase over the next 12 months. The number of respondents expecting finance costs to come down, meanwhile, fell by two percentage points to 9%, which was nevertheless still the second-highest figure recorded in this regard since August 2011. Owners were the only main category to record an increase in the numbers of respondents expecting higher finance costs (up from 36% to 41%). The figure for brokers was down from 50% to 36%, while both managers (down from 44% to 40%) and charterers (down ten percentage points to 28%) recorded all-time survey lows in this respect.
The number of respondents in Asia anticipating an increase in the cost of finance fell by 4 percentage points to 49%, while in Europe the numbers were up from 33% to 35%. In North America, meanwhile, the numbers anticipating higher finance costs fell sharply from 57% to 33%.
One respondent said: “Financing is a big problem”, while another noted, “It is difficult to finance new projects, given unsatisfactory returns on investment and perceived risk levels on the part of banks.”
Turning to the freight markets, there was, for the second survey in succession, an increased expectation of higher rates in the tanker and dry bulk sectors. One respondent claimed, “Rates have not reached this level since October 2008.” In the container ship market, meanwhile, confidence was maintained at existing levels.
The number of respondents overall who expressed an expectation of higher rates in the tanker sector over the next twelve months was up by 5 percentage points to 43%, the highest figure since May 2011. Owners led the way, with 52% anticipating higher rates, as opposed to 37% last time. Managers’ expectations in this regard were up by one percentage point to 37%, but 40% of brokers (as opposed to 35%) thought that tanker rates were likely to go up over the coming year. Charterers, however, were of a different mind, with the number anticipating higher tanker rates falling from 43% to 36%.
Geographically, the prospects for increased tanker rates were deemed higher this time by respondents in Asia (up from 39% to 46%), in Europe (up from 36% to 40%) and in North America (up by 40 percentage points to 83%).
In the dry bulk sector, meanwhile, there was a 14 percentage-point increase, to 56%, in the overall numbers of those anticipating rate increases. This is the highest figure recorded in the life of the survey, and 100% up on the corresponding figure when the survey was launched in 2008. Managers, up by 22 percentage points to a survey high of 60%, led the way, followed by owners, up 6 percentage points to 58%, another all-time high. Even charterers, recording a 5 percentage-point increase to 47%, and brokers (up by 25 percentage points to 46%) were looking on the bright side.
Expectations of higher dry bulk rates over the next 12 months were up to all-time survey highs in both Asia and Europe, rising by 21% and 13% respectively to levels of 63% and 55%. The numbers were also up, by 8 percentage points to 64%, in North America.
One respondent said: “The dry cargo market is coming into balance and, with the new eco-ships on the way, everything looks very positive for those owners who have the right fleet profile and minimal counter-party risk.” Elsewhere, however, it was noted, “Strong dry bulk markets can only last for a very short time, making it difficult to compensate for the poor market conditions we have seen in recent years.”
In the container ship market, the numbers expecting rates to increase over the coming 12 months was unchanged at 30%. Owners’ expectations were up by 3 percentage points on last time to 30%, while optimism in this regard on the part of brokers rose from 25% to 29%. The expectations of managers rose two percentage points to 30 per cent, while those of charterers held steady, also at 30%. Geographically, expectations of improved container ship rates were up by 3 percentage points in Asia to 36%, by 9 percentage points in North America to 44%, and unchanged in Europe at 27%.
One respondent made the extravagant claim that, “All non-operator-owned container ships need to be removed from the market, so that over-supply can be corrected.”
Moore Stephens Shipping Partner, Richard Greiner, said: “The findings of this latest survey provide more good news for the shipping industry. It is now fifteen months since we recorded a decline in shipping confidence. There is an old adage which says that confidence is contagious. If that is true, shipping certainly seems to have caught the bug.
“It was noticeable on this occasion that, in contrast to previous surveys, very few of our respondents referred to the effect that the global economic and political situation is having on their business. This does not mean, of course, that those problems have gone away. But it is a clear indication that they are perceived to be improving, to the extent that the industry is now focusing on issues closer to home, and moreover on problems where they can realistically contribute towards helping to find a solution.
“Those problems represent a significant challenge for the shipping industry. Moreover, they continue to have a familiar ring to them. There are still too many ships for the cargoes available on many trades. There is not the ready access to bank finance that many would like. Operating costs are expected to rise over the next two years, following the fall for 2012 recorded by Moore Stephens’ ship operating costs benchmark study OpCost. Crew wages are only moving in one direction. The cost of keeping up with regulatory compliance is now a big-ticket item. And P&I premiums are on the increase.
“These problems will not go away. But the prospect of being able to fund them properly is brighter now than for some time. Expectations of improved rates in the dry bulk sector are now higher than at any time in the last five years, while in the tanker market the mood is at its most bullish for two and a half years. In the container trades, things are meanwhile holding up well. In short, there should be more money about next year, although no shortage of things to spend it on.
“Some of that money will have to be spent on compliance and on increased operating costs, but there could be some over for new investment, expectations of which are running at their highest survey levels for two and a half years. That is good news, particularly when viewed together with indications of the increasing interest being shown in shipping by non-industry investors. The latter, of course, can bring problems of its own, but in principle the prospect of new money coming into shipping should be a good thing.
“Whatever the level of new money coming in, the vast majority of players who have survived the downturn of the past five years are very much old money in terms of their industry experience. They have taken the worst that can be thrown at them and are still standing. That means that they have committed to operating in a cleaner and leaner shipping industry, and to meeting the costs that go with it. Provided the evidence of improved confidence that we are seeing does not turn out to be a false dawn, they can reasonably expect to reap better rewards over the coming years than they have for some time.”
Source: Moore Stephens / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 December 13
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS UP 37.83% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended December 16, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 3.45 ...
Monday, 16 December 13
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP LOST $ 0.53 IN A WEEK
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB) for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained $ 0.91 pmt month on month on Friday 13 December 2013 ...
Monday, 16 December 13
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL Q3' 14 DELIVERY PRICE CLOSED $1.63 LESSER THAN Q1' 14 PRICE
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 5.34 percept month on month as on Friday 13 December 2013. ...
Sunday, 15 December 13
SUPRAMAX'S FREIGHT RALLY COMES TO AN END THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI was up by 7 pct closing at 2,330 points week on week and the cape index was also up by 10.51 points and closed at 4,246 points ...
Friday, 13 December 13
HARD COAL : VOLUMES POSSIBLY AT RECORD-BREAKING HIGH; PRICES POSSIBLY AT A RECORD-BREAKING LOW - VDKI
Press Release : World Hard Coal Market 2013: volumes possibly at record-breaking high, prices possibly at a record-breaking low. German and UK impor ...
|
|
|
Showing 3951 to 3955 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|