COALspot.com keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events


Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Thursday, 19 December 13
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE HITS THREE-YEAR HIGH - MOORE STEPHENS


Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry rose to their highest level for more than three years over the three-month period to November 2013, according to the latest Shipping Confidence Survey from international accountant and shipping adviser Moore Stephens. There was encouraging news on freight rates, and evidence of an increased willingness to invest. But concern persists on overtonnaging, operating costs, and the cost of regulation.

In November 2013, the average confidence level expressed by respondents in the markets in which they operate was 6.1 on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high), compared to the 5.9 recorded in the previous survey in August 2013. This is the highest figure since the 6.2 recorded in August 2010. The survey was launched in May 2008 with a confidence rating of 6.8.

Despite the overall improvement in confidence, owners were the only category of individual respondent to post an increase this time, from 5.8 to 6.2, the highest figure recorded since May 2010. Confidence on the part of managers, however, was down from 6.2 to 6.1, while for charterers there was a drop from 6.3 to 5.7. Geographically, confidence was down in Asia (from 6.1 to 5.9) but up in Europe (from 5.9 to 6.1) and in North America, from 6.0 to 6.6.

The mood of optimism apparent in a number of responses was typified by the respondent who noted: “We clearly see an upswing in the markets when talking to various people at various locations in the last couple of months. There is, for the first time in a long while, a general feeling of optimism. Furthermore, the economic indicators, both small and large, all over the world, are pointing in the direction of recovery. We cannot expect it to reach the same levels as in 2007/2008, but a sustainable level of confidence is much better than skyrocketing markets because the higher you climb the lower you might fall.”

Another respondent pointed out: “The light we see at the end of the tunnel is not, as had been feared, a train coming towards us. We are quietly optimistic, with supply and demand seeming to come into balance, despite concerns over the amount of new orders being placed.”

One respondent emphasised: “A growing global economy, including the US and the EU, is crucial for an improved shipping market, and there are some good signs of that at the moment, which makes us hopeful for the future.” Another remarked, “We envisage the market growing in Asia, and in Brazil and Russia, typified by increasing imports of products for use in energy projects. We also see an increase in the use of gas as an alternative energy source, with many countries developing infrastructure and facilities to facilitate distribution.”

Others were slightly more guarded, such as the respondents who noted: “The shipping market will stay more or less at current levels well into next year as the world economic situation continues to fluctuate,” and, “The shipping industry in general is very weak at present, although we do expect improvements in 2014.” Others still remained pessimistic, such as the respondent who complained, “Shipping companies are facing a number of challenges, including low market rates caused by overtonnaging in a number of sectors, slow growth in the global economy, and increases in global ship operating costs.” Another noted, “Supply remains higher than demand, with significant falls in freight rates, while operating costs are always increasing. All this means that the shipping business is no longer attractive.”

Elsewhere it was noted: “Things are still pretty fragile, and it wouldn’t take much to knock many operators back into the hole again,” and, “We think the industry is stuck where it is for another year as available tonnage waits for an uplift in world trade.”

The overriding concern on the part of respondents once more related to the levels of excess tonnage both in the market and about to enter it. “There is too much shipbuilding capacity which, coupled with the entry of new investors, will lead to a continuation in the current oversupply of tonnage and low rates,” said one respondent. Another noted: “We need to convince owners to stop building ships, especially tankers,” while another observed “There is a large surplus which is unlikely to be removed for two or three years.”

One respondent said: “Our principal concern is the perennial ability of owners to kill off improvements by increasing the supply of vessels in every sector,” while another feared, “The higher average rates we are likely to see in 2014 will be killed off by massive new deliveries in 2015.”  Yet another observed, “Owners must be disciplined when placing new orders, even if they have the luxury of using other people’s money.”

Operating costs and the cost of regulatory compliance continued to concern respondents, one of whom noted “Regulations to control emissions are commendable, and owners will have to adhere to them, but they will need financial support to compensate for the high cost of installing technologically advanced equipment to meet the requirements.” Another pointed out, “Regulatory requirements are still not fully factored into economic assessments, be they financing or investment decisions, and this will come back to haunt the industry.”

“Operating costs and the increasing cost of regulation are major factors,” noted one respondent, “and indeed the cost of additional regulation directly affects operating costs. There is a problem also with the supply of qualified crew, especially in certain niche markets, due to the ‘greying’ of the supply pool.” Another respondent simply said: “Low freight rates, high operating costs and costly regulations are killing us.”

The likelihood of respondents making a major investment or significant development over the next 12 months was up on the previous survey, on a scale of 1 to 10, from 5.5 to 5.8 which, as with overall confidence, is the highest figure recorded since August 2010. The figure for managers was up from 5.8 to its highest ever figure of 6.1, while that for owners was also up, from 5.8 to 6.0. Although charterers recorded a fall, from 6.7 to 6.4, they remain the most optimistic category of respondent in terms of the likelihood of making a new investment.

The number of managers rating the likelihood of making a new investment over the next twelve months at 7.0 out of 10.0, or higher, was up from 45 per cent to 51 per cent, while the number of owners who thought likewise was up by one percentage point from 47 per cent to 48 per cent. The percentage of charterers of like mind, however, was down from 72 per cent to 45 per cent. Geographically, expectation levels of major investments were up in both Asia and Europe, from 5.5 to 5.7 and from 5.6 to 5.8 respectively, and in North America from 5.0 to 5.8.

One respondent said: “While earnings and income are low, there is still a great deal of activity involving planning and preparing for the future, and indeed we are investing with a very positive attitude.” Another noted: “Some major owners have the funds available to acquire tonnage. But the key is timing, and too many big shipping companies are intent on looking good on paper despite the fact that they are actually drowning.”

A number of respondents referred to the increasing involvement in the industry of non-shipping investors. One said: “The risk of overcapacity in all sectors has increased now that so many non-shipping investors have discovered the shipping market”, while another noted “Over the past five years we have seen a lot of non-shipping investors enter the market, and they have now seen that shipping is not an easy business. But we are hopeful for the future, and now is certainly not the time to leave the table.”

Demand trends, competition and finance costs once again featured as the top three factors cited by respondents overall as those likely to influence performance most significantly over the coming twelve months. The overall numbers for demand trends and finance costs were down by one percentage point to 23% and 15 % respectively, while competition was unchanged at 19%. Tonnage supply (unchanged at 13%) featured in fourth place, ahead of fuel costs (static at 10%) and operating costs, another non-mover, at 9%.

Demand trends remained the number one performance-affecting factor for owners, unchanged at 25 %. Tonnage supply, meanwhile, was up one percentage point to 17% in joint-second place with finance costs, up 2 percentage points. For managers, meanwhile, competition was in first place, up 2 percentage points to 22%, the highest figure in the life of the survey. Demand trends, unchanged at 15%, featured in second place ahead of finance costs, down four percentage points to 14%.

For charterers, demand trends, although down by 7 percentage points to 26%, featured in first place, ahead of competition (up 2 percentage points to 22%), and tonnage supply, unchanged at 16%.

Geographically, demand trends were the most significant factor for respondents in Asia (up by one percentage point to 24%), Europe (down to 22% from 24%) and North America (up by 3 percentage points to 35%, the highest figure recorded since the survey was launched). Competition and finance costs, in that order, made up the top three performance-affecting factors in both Asia and Europe, while in North America it was competition and tonnage supply.

There was a one percentage-point fall (from 41% to 40%) in the number of respondents overall who expected finance costs to increase over the next 12 months. The number of respondents expecting finance costs to come down, meanwhile, fell by two percentage points to 9%, which was nevertheless still the second-highest figure recorded in this regard since August 2011. Owners were the only main category to record an increase in the numbers of respondents expecting higher finance costs (up from 36% to 41%).  The figure for brokers was down from 50% to 36%, while both managers (down from 44% to 40%) and charterers (down ten percentage points to 28%) recorded all-time survey lows in this respect.

The number of respondents in Asia anticipating an increase in the cost of finance fell by 4 percentage points to 49%, while in Europe the numbers were up from 33% to 35%. In North America, meanwhile, the numbers anticipating higher finance costs fell sharply from 57% to 33%.

One respondent said: “Financing is a big problem”, while another noted, “It is difficult to finance new projects, given unsatisfactory returns on investment and perceived risk levels on the part of banks.”

Turning to the freight markets, there was, for the second survey in succession, an increased expectation of higher rates in the tanker and dry bulk sectors. One respondent claimed, “Rates have not reached this level since October 2008.” In the container ship market, meanwhile, confidence was maintained at existing levels.

The number of respondents overall who expressed an expectation of higher rates in the tanker sector over the next twelve months was up by 5 percentage points to 43%, the highest figure since May 2011. Owners led the way, with 52% anticipating higher rates, as opposed to 37% last time. Managers’ expectations in this regard were up by one percentage point to 37%, but 40% of brokers (as opposed to 35%) thought that tanker rates were likely to go up over the coming year. Charterers, however, were of a different mind, with the number anticipating higher tanker rates falling from 43% to 36%.

Geographically, the prospects for increased tanker rates were deemed higher this time by respondents in Asia (up from 39% to 46%), in Europe (up from 36% to 40%) and in North America (up by 40 percentage points to 83%).

In the dry bulk sector, meanwhile, there was a 14 percentage-point increase, to 56%, in the overall numbers of those anticipating rate increases. This is the highest figure recorded in the life of the survey, and 100% up on the corresponding figure when the survey was launched in 2008. Managers, up by 22 percentage points to a survey high of 60%, led the way, followed by owners, up 6 percentage points to 58%, another all-time high. Even charterers, recording a 5 percentage-point increase to 47%, and brokers (up by 25 percentage points to 46%) were looking on the bright side.

Expectations of higher dry bulk rates over the next 12 months were up to all-time survey highs in both Asia and Europe, rising by 21% and 13% respectively to levels of 63% and 55%. The numbers were also up, by 8 percentage points to 64%, in North America.

One respondent said: “The dry cargo market is coming into balance and, with the new eco-ships on the way, everything looks very positive for those owners who have the right fleet profile and minimal counter-party risk.” Elsewhere, however, it was noted, “Strong dry bulk markets can only last for a very short time, making it difficult to compensate for the poor market conditions we have seen in recent years.”

In the container ship market, the numbers expecting rates to increase over the coming 12 months was unchanged at 30%. Owners’ expectations were up by 3 percentage points on last time to 30%, while optimism in this regard on the part of brokers rose from 25% to 29%.  The expectations of managers rose two percentage points to 30 per cent, while those of charterers held steady, also at 30%. Geographically, expectations of improved container ship rates were up by 3 percentage points in Asia to 36%, by 9 percentage points in North America to 44%, and unchanged in Europe at 27%.

One respondent made the extravagant claim that, “All non-operator-owned container ships need to be removed from the market, so that over-supply can be corrected.”

Moore Stephens Shipping Partner, Richard Greiner, said: “The findings of this latest survey provide more good news for the shipping industry. It is now fifteen months since we recorded a decline in shipping confidence. There is an old adage which says that confidence is contagious. If that is true, shipping certainly seems to have caught the bug.

“It was noticeable on this occasion that, in contrast to previous surveys, very few of our respondents referred to the effect that the global economic and political situation is having on their business. This does not mean, of course, that those problems have gone away. But it is a clear indication that they are perceived to be improving, to the extent that the industry is now focusing on issues closer to home, and moreover on problems where they can realistically contribute towards helping to find a solution.

“Those problems represent a significant challenge for the shipping industry. Moreover, they continue to have a familiar ring to them. There are still too many ships for the cargoes available on many trades. There is not the ready access to bank finance that many would like. Operating costs are expected to rise over the next two years, following the fall for 2012 recorded by Moore Stephens’ ship operating costs benchmark study OpCost. Crew wages are only moving in one direction. The cost of keeping up with regulatory compliance is now a big-ticket item. And P&I premiums are on the increase.

“These problems will not go away. But the prospect of being able to fund them properly is brighter now than for some time. Expectations of improved rates in the dry bulk sector are now higher than at any time in the last five years, while in the tanker market the mood is at its most bullish for two and a half years. In the container trades, things are meanwhile holding up well. In short, there should be more money about next year, although no shortage of things to spend it on.

“Some of that money will have to be spent on compliance and on increased operating costs, but there could be some over for new investment, expectations of which are running at their highest survey levels for two and a half years. That is good news, particularly when viewed together with indications of the increasing interest being shown in shipping by non-industry investors. The latter, of course, can bring problems of its own, but in principle the prospect of new money coming into shipping should be a good thing.

“Whatever the level of new money coming in, the vast majority of players who have survived the downturn of the past five years are very much old money in terms of their industry experience. They have taken the worst that can be thrown at them and are still standing. That means that they have committed to operating in a cleaner and leaner shipping industry, and to meeting the costs that go with it. Provided the evidence of improved confidence that we are seeing does not turn out to be a false dawn, they can reasonably expect to reap better rewards over the coming years than they have for some time.”
Source: Moore Stephens / Hellenic Shipping News



If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Sunday, 22 December 13
QUIET FREIGHT MARKET DUE TO LONG HOLIDAYS
COALspot.com: The market was soft this week with all indices down. However towards second half of the week the futures on segments was firming up. ...


Friday, 20 December 13
US PRODUCED 2.71% MORE COAL WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...


Friday, 20 December 13
DRY BULK MARKET SLUMPS AHEAD OF HOLIDAY SEASON - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
As has been the case in recent years, the dry bulk market has been on a downward trend ahead of the Holiday Season for a large part of the world. Th ...


Wednesday, 18 December 13
SNP ACTIVITY IN CHINA SEEMS TO BE SLOWING DOWN - CHRISTOS TRAGEAS
Approaching the end of the year, SnP activity in China seems to be slowing down in comparison to the first half of this quarter, as most Chinese Shi ...


Wednesday, 18 December 13
DEMOLITION ACTIVITY SCALED BACK AS FREIGHT RATES RISE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
It's always been the case that each time we witness a spike in freight rates, demolition activity is decreasing, as owners are looking for more car ...


   788 789 790 791 792   
Showing 3946 to 3950 news of total 6871
News by Category
Popular News
 
Total Members : 28,691
Member
Panelist
User ID
Password
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Free
Register
Forgot Password
 
Our Members Are From ...

  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • SRK Consulting
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Platts
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • bp singapore
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Indian Energy Exchange, India
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • World Coal - UK
  • Inspectorate - India
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Electricity Authority, New Zealand
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • GB Group - China
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Maersk Broker
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Coal India Limited
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • KPCL - India
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Australian Coal Association
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • Enel Italy
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Thriveni
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Lafarge - France
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • APGENCO India
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • JPower - Japan
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • U S Energy Resources
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • PetroVietnam
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • UBS Singapore
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • TNPL - India
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • EIA - United States
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Malco - India
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Mitsui
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Tata Power - India
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • World Bank
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • The University of Queensland
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Shree Cement - India
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • KPMG - USA
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Surastha Cement
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Cosco
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • TGV SRAAC LIMITED, India
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • NALCO India
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Bank of America
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • WorleyParsons
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia