COALspot.com keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events


Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Thursday, 19 December 13
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE HITS THREE-YEAR HIGH - MOORE STEPHENS


Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry rose to their highest level for more than three years over the three-month period to November 2013, according to the latest Shipping Confidence Survey from international accountant and shipping adviser Moore Stephens. There was encouraging news on freight rates, and evidence of an increased willingness to invest. But concern persists on overtonnaging, operating costs, and the cost of regulation.

In November 2013, the average confidence level expressed by respondents in the markets in which they operate was 6.1 on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high), compared to the 5.9 recorded in the previous survey in August 2013. This is the highest figure since the 6.2 recorded in August 2010. The survey was launched in May 2008 with a confidence rating of 6.8.

Despite the overall improvement in confidence, owners were the only category of individual respondent to post an increase this time, from 5.8 to 6.2, the highest figure recorded since May 2010. Confidence on the part of managers, however, was down from 6.2 to 6.1, while for charterers there was a drop from 6.3 to 5.7. Geographically, confidence was down in Asia (from 6.1 to 5.9) but up in Europe (from 5.9 to 6.1) and in North America, from 6.0 to 6.6.

The mood of optimism apparent in a number of responses was typified by the respondent who noted: “We clearly see an upswing in the markets when talking to various people at various locations in the last couple of months. There is, for the first time in a long while, a general feeling of optimism. Furthermore, the economic indicators, both small and large, all over the world, are pointing in the direction of recovery. We cannot expect it to reach the same levels as in 2007/2008, but a sustainable level of confidence is much better than skyrocketing markets because the higher you climb the lower you might fall.”

Another respondent pointed out: “The light we see at the end of the tunnel is not, as had been feared, a train coming towards us. We are quietly optimistic, with supply and demand seeming to come into balance, despite concerns over the amount of new orders being placed.”

One respondent emphasised: “A growing global economy, including the US and the EU, is crucial for an improved shipping market, and there are some good signs of that at the moment, which makes us hopeful for the future.” Another remarked, “We envisage the market growing in Asia, and in Brazil and Russia, typified by increasing imports of products for use in energy projects. We also see an increase in the use of gas as an alternative energy source, with many countries developing infrastructure and facilities to facilitate distribution.”

Others were slightly more guarded, such as the respondents who noted: “The shipping market will stay more or less at current levels well into next year as the world economic situation continues to fluctuate,” and, “The shipping industry in general is very weak at present, although we do expect improvements in 2014.” Others still remained pessimistic, such as the respondent who complained, “Shipping companies are facing a number of challenges, including low market rates caused by overtonnaging in a number of sectors, slow growth in the global economy, and increases in global ship operating costs.” Another noted, “Supply remains higher than demand, with significant falls in freight rates, while operating costs are always increasing. All this means that the shipping business is no longer attractive.”

Elsewhere it was noted: “Things are still pretty fragile, and it wouldn’t take much to knock many operators back into the hole again,” and, “We think the industry is stuck where it is for another year as available tonnage waits for an uplift in world trade.”

The overriding concern on the part of respondents once more related to the levels of excess tonnage both in the market and about to enter it. “There is too much shipbuilding capacity which, coupled with the entry of new investors, will lead to a continuation in the current oversupply of tonnage and low rates,” said one respondent. Another noted: “We need to convince owners to stop building ships, especially tankers,” while another observed “There is a large surplus which is unlikely to be removed for two or three years.”

One respondent said: “Our principal concern is the perennial ability of owners to kill off improvements by increasing the supply of vessels in every sector,” while another feared, “The higher average rates we are likely to see in 2014 will be killed off by massive new deliveries in 2015.”  Yet another observed, “Owners must be disciplined when placing new orders, even if they have the luxury of using other people’s money.”

Operating costs and the cost of regulatory compliance continued to concern respondents, one of whom noted “Regulations to control emissions are commendable, and owners will have to adhere to them, but they will need financial support to compensate for the high cost of installing technologically advanced equipment to meet the requirements.” Another pointed out, “Regulatory requirements are still not fully factored into economic assessments, be they financing or investment decisions, and this will come back to haunt the industry.”

“Operating costs and the increasing cost of regulation are major factors,” noted one respondent, “and indeed the cost of additional regulation directly affects operating costs. There is a problem also with the supply of qualified crew, especially in certain niche markets, due to the ‘greying’ of the supply pool.” Another respondent simply said: “Low freight rates, high operating costs and costly regulations are killing us.”

The likelihood of respondents making a major investment or significant development over the next 12 months was up on the previous survey, on a scale of 1 to 10, from 5.5 to 5.8 which, as with overall confidence, is the highest figure recorded since August 2010. The figure for managers was up from 5.8 to its highest ever figure of 6.1, while that for owners was also up, from 5.8 to 6.0. Although charterers recorded a fall, from 6.7 to 6.4, they remain the most optimistic category of respondent in terms of the likelihood of making a new investment.

The number of managers rating the likelihood of making a new investment over the next twelve months at 7.0 out of 10.0, or higher, was up from 45 per cent to 51 per cent, while the number of owners who thought likewise was up by one percentage point from 47 per cent to 48 per cent. The percentage of charterers of like mind, however, was down from 72 per cent to 45 per cent. Geographically, expectation levels of major investments were up in both Asia and Europe, from 5.5 to 5.7 and from 5.6 to 5.8 respectively, and in North America from 5.0 to 5.8.

One respondent said: “While earnings and income are low, there is still a great deal of activity involving planning and preparing for the future, and indeed we are investing with a very positive attitude.” Another noted: “Some major owners have the funds available to acquire tonnage. But the key is timing, and too many big shipping companies are intent on looking good on paper despite the fact that they are actually drowning.”

A number of respondents referred to the increasing involvement in the industry of non-shipping investors. One said: “The risk of overcapacity in all sectors has increased now that so many non-shipping investors have discovered the shipping market”, while another noted “Over the past five years we have seen a lot of non-shipping investors enter the market, and they have now seen that shipping is not an easy business. But we are hopeful for the future, and now is certainly not the time to leave the table.”

Demand trends, competition and finance costs once again featured as the top three factors cited by respondents overall as those likely to influence performance most significantly over the coming twelve months. The overall numbers for demand trends and finance costs were down by one percentage point to 23% and 15 % respectively, while competition was unchanged at 19%. Tonnage supply (unchanged at 13%) featured in fourth place, ahead of fuel costs (static at 10%) and operating costs, another non-mover, at 9%.

Demand trends remained the number one performance-affecting factor for owners, unchanged at 25 %. Tonnage supply, meanwhile, was up one percentage point to 17% in joint-second place with finance costs, up 2 percentage points. For managers, meanwhile, competition was in first place, up 2 percentage points to 22%, the highest figure in the life of the survey. Demand trends, unchanged at 15%, featured in second place ahead of finance costs, down four percentage points to 14%.

For charterers, demand trends, although down by 7 percentage points to 26%, featured in first place, ahead of competition (up 2 percentage points to 22%), and tonnage supply, unchanged at 16%.

Geographically, demand trends were the most significant factor for respondents in Asia (up by one percentage point to 24%), Europe (down to 22% from 24%) and North America (up by 3 percentage points to 35%, the highest figure recorded since the survey was launched). Competition and finance costs, in that order, made up the top three performance-affecting factors in both Asia and Europe, while in North America it was competition and tonnage supply.

There was a one percentage-point fall (from 41% to 40%) in the number of respondents overall who expected finance costs to increase over the next 12 months. The number of respondents expecting finance costs to come down, meanwhile, fell by two percentage points to 9%, which was nevertheless still the second-highest figure recorded in this regard since August 2011. Owners were the only main category to record an increase in the numbers of respondents expecting higher finance costs (up from 36% to 41%).  The figure for brokers was down from 50% to 36%, while both managers (down from 44% to 40%) and charterers (down ten percentage points to 28%) recorded all-time survey lows in this respect.

The number of respondents in Asia anticipating an increase in the cost of finance fell by 4 percentage points to 49%, while in Europe the numbers were up from 33% to 35%. In North America, meanwhile, the numbers anticipating higher finance costs fell sharply from 57% to 33%.

One respondent said: “Financing is a big problem”, while another noted, “It is difficult to finance new projects, given unsatisfactory returns on investment and perceived risk levels on the part of banks.”

Turning to the freight markets, there was, for the second survey in succession, an increased expectation of higher rates in the tanker and dry bulk sectors. One respondent claimed, “Rates have not reached this level since October 2008.” In the container ship market, meanwhile, confidence was maintained at existing levels.

The number of respondents overall who expressed an expectation of higher rates in the tanker sector over the next twelve months was up by 5 percentage points to 43%, the highest figure since May 2011. Owners led the way, with 52% anticipating higher rates, as opposed to 37% last time. Managers’ expectations in this regard were up by one percentage point to 37%, but 40% of brokers (as opposed to 35%) thought that tanker rates were likely to go up over the coming year. Charterers, however, were of a different mind, with the number anticipating higher tanker rates falling from 43% to 36%.

Geographically, the prospects for increased tanker rates were deemed higher this time by respondents in Asia (up from 39% to 46%), in Europe (up from 36% to 40%) and in North America (up by 40 percentage points to 83%).

In the dry bulk sector, meanwhile, there was a 14 percentage-point increase, to 56%, in the overall numbers of those anticipating rate increases. This is the highest figure recorded in the life of the survey, and 100% up on the corresponding figure when the survey was launched in 2008. Managers, up by 22 percentage points to a survey high of 60%, led the way, followed by owners, up 6 percentage points to 58%, another all-time high. Even charterers, recording a 5 percentage-point increase to 47%, and brokers (up by 25 percentage points to 46%) were looking on the bright side.

Expectations of higher dry bulk rates over the next 12 months were up to all-time survey highs in both Asia and Europe, rising by 21% and 13% respectively to levels of 63% and 55%. The numbers were also up, by 8 percentage points to 64%, in North America.

One respondent said: “The dry cargo market is coming into balance and, with the new eco-ships on the way, everything looks very positive for those owners who have the right fleet profile and minimal counter-party risk.” Elsewhere, however, it was noted, “Strong dry bulk markets can only last for a very short time, making it difficult to compensate for the poor market conditions we have seen in recent years.”

In the container ship market, the numbers expecting rates to increase over the coming 12 months was unchanged at 30%. Owners’ expectations were up by 3 percentage points on last time to 30%, while optimism in this regard on the part of brokers rose from 25% to 29%.  The expectations of managers rose two percentage points to 30 per cent, while those of charterers held steady, also at 30%. Geographically, expectations of improved container ship rates were up by 3 percentage points in Asia to 36%, by 9 percentage points in North America to 44%, and unchanged in Europe at 27%.

One respondent made the extravagant claim that, “All non-operator-owned container ships need to be removed from the market, so that over-supply can be corrected.”

Moore Stephens Shipping Partner, Richard Greiner, said: “The findings of this latest survey provide more good news for the shipping industry. It is now fifteen months since we recorded a decline in shipping confidence. There is an old adage which says that confidence is contagious. If that is true, shipping certainly seems to have caught the bug.

“It was noticeable on this occasion that, in contrast to previous surveys, very few of our respondents referred to the effect that the global economic and political situation is having on their business. This does not mean, of course, that those problems have gone away. But it is a clear indication that they are perceived to be improving, to the extent that the industry is now focusing on issues closer to home, and moreover on problems where they can realistically contribute towards helping to find a solution.

“Those problems represent a significant challenge for the shipping industry. Moreover, they continue to have a familiar ring to them. There are still too many ships for the cargoes available on many trades. There is not the ready access to bank finance that many would like. Operating costs are expected to rise over the next two years, following the fall for 2012 recorded by Moore Stephens’ ship operating costs benchmark study OpCost. Crew wages are only moving in one direction. The cost of keeping up with regulatory compliance is now a big-ticket item. And P&I premiums are on the increase.

“These problems will not go away. But the prospect of being able to fund them properly is brighter now than for some time. Expectations of improved rates in the dry bulk sector are now higher than at any time in the last five years, while in the tanker market the mood is at its most bullish for two and a half years. In the container trades, things are meanwhile holding up well. In short, there should be more money about next year, although no shortage of things to spend it on.

“Some of that money will have to be spent on compliance and on increased operating costs, but there could be some over for new investment, expectations of which are running at their highest survey levels for two and a half years. That is good news, particularly when viewed together with indications of the increasing interest being shown in shipping by non-industry investors. The latter, of course, can bring problems of its own, but in principle the prospect of new money coming into shipping should be a good thing.

“Whatever the level of new money coming in, the vast majority of players who have survived the downturn of the past five years are very much old money in terms of their industry experience. They have taken the worst that can be thrown at them and are still standing. That means that they have committed to operating in a cleaner and leaner shipping industry, and to meeting the costs that go with it. Provided the evidence of improved confidence that we are seeing does not turn out to be a false dawn, they can reasonably expect to reap better rewards over the coming years than they have for some time.”
Source: Moore Stephens / Hellenic Shipping News



If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Monday, 09 December 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q3' 14 DELIVERY CLOSED $ 0.57 LESSER THAN Q1 CLOSING
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q1’ 14  delivery gained $ 1.49 pmt month on month on Friday 6 Decembe ...


Sunday, 08 December 13
SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS SHOW A DECLINE TREND IN Q2 & Q3' 14
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 6.76 percept month on month as on Friday 6 December 2013. T ...


Sunday, 08 December 13
RBCT SHIPPED 63.446 MMT OF COALS YTD
COALspot.com - Richards Bay Coal Terminal (RBCT), the world's single largest coal terminal has shipped 63,446,232 mt of coals YTD, according to por ...


Saturday, 07 December 13
SUPRAMAX SHIPS FOR EC INDIA TO CHINA ROUTE BEING FIXED AT AROUND US$ 13K - SOLYM
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to be firm due to high Iron ore demand. The cape index was up by almost 25 pct this week. The grain seaso ...


Saturday, 07 December 13
A RARE TIME IN RECENT SHIPPING MARKET HISTORY: BOTH DRY BULK AND VLCC TANKER EARNINGS ARE ON THE RISE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Around this time of year, back in 2008, i.e. five years ago, the shipping markets were plagued with the aftermath of the global financial crisis tha ...


   792 793 794 795 796   
Showing 3966 to 3970 news of total 6871
News by Category
Popular News
 
Total Members : 28,620
Member
Panelist
User ID
Password
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Free
Register
Forgot Password
 
Our Members Are From ...

  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • bp singapore
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Tata Power - India
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Platts
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • TGV SRAAC LIMITED, India
  • Cosco
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • SRK Consulting
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Bank of America
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Lafarge - France
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • GB Group - China
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Coal India Limited
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • The University of Queensland
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • JPower - Japan
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • World Bank
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Indian School of Mines
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Planning Commission, India
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • World Coal - UK
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Surastha Cement
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Clarksons - UK
  • UBS Singapore
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • APGENCO India
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Asian Development Bank
  • PetroVietnam
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • IOL Indonesia
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • EIA - United States
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • KPCL - India
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Enel Italy
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • WorleyParsons
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • CESC Limited - India
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Mitsui
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • NALCO India
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Indian Energy Exchange, India
  • ETA - Dubai
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Electricity Authority, New Zealand
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Malco - India
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • KPMG - USA
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Thriveni
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Vale Mozambique
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • JPMorgan - India
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • TNPL - India
  • Maersk Broker
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE