We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 06 July 15
KOREA MIDLAND POWER COMPANY LIMITED ISSUED A TENDER FOR 250K MT BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender for 250K Metric Tons (MT) of 5300 kcal/kg NAR coal ...
Monday, 06 July 15
COAL TRADING & RISK MANAGEMENT TRAINING COURSE
Are you ready to invest in yourself and take your trading and risk management strategy to the next level? The Coal Trading & Risk Management Tr ...
Monday, 06 July 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP; DECLINED D-O-D,W-O-W AND M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.53 (1.01%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap ...
Sunday, 05 July 15
THE BALTIC DRY INDEX WAS DOWN 18%; PANAMAX UP 9%
COALspot.com: The freight market was soft during this week. However indices closed slightly firmer end of the week on 3rd July.
The BDI was do ...
Friday, 03 July 15
U.S DELIVERS WEAK FIRST HALF COAL PRODUCTION; 8.8% LOWER Y-O-Y
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.5 million short ...
|
|
|
Showing 2941 to 2945 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
