We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 03 July 15
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE EQUALS SEVEN-YEAR LOW - MOORE STEPHENS
Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry fell during the three months to May 2015 to a level equal to the lowest rating recorded in the p ...
Thursday, 02 July 15
TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION IN MINING 2015 - IXG
Information Exchange Group’s Technology and Innovation in Mining 2015- International Summit on Mining
Press Release: The inaugural editi ...
Thursday, 02 July 15
THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CAPESIZE SEGMENT PUSHED DRY BULK MARKET TO UPWARD LAST WEEK
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market continued its upward movement last week, with the BDI closing off on Friday (26 June) in excess of 800 points, wh ...
Wednesday, 01 July 15
Q4'15 AND Q1'16 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS ROSE W-O-W AND M-O-M
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q3' 2015 rose month over month and down week over week.
The Q3 swap was up US$ ...
Wednesday, 01 July 15
BEIJING HAS OFFICIALLY EXTENDED BY TWO YEARS ITS SUBSIDY PROGRAM TO SUPPORT LOCAL SHIPPING COMPANIES IN SCRAPPING THEIR OLD TONNAGE - INTERMODAL
Last week, Beijing has officially extended by two years its subsidy program to support local shipping companies in scrapping their old tonnage in w ...
|
|
|
Showing 2946 to 2950 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Australian Coal Association
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
