We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 12 July 15
SHIPYARD NOT LIABLE FOR ENGINE ROOM FIRE CAUSED BY OIL LEAKAGE - BIRCH WINDAHL
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A Danish vessel owner requested a Danish shipyard to undertake repairs and maintenance works on its vessel. An agreement ...
Saturday, 11 July 15
MAJOR IRANIAN GAS EXPORTS WILL TAKE AT LEAST FIVE YEARS - FITCH
Iran has the long-term potential to become one of the world's top gas producers, thanks to its 34 trillion cubic meters (tcm) of natural gas re ...
Friday, 10 July 15
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS POSITIVE MOMENTUM - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has kept its positive momentum over the course of the past few days, thanks to Panamax gains. During yesterday’s session ...
Friday, 10 July 15
U.S PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY TOTALED AN ESTIMATED 14.1 MMST WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 14.1 million short ...
Thursday, 09 July 15
CPP MARKET : POSITIVE IN THE SHORT TERM - GEORGE VASTARDIS
Despite the traditionally quieter summer period, the clean tanker market has so far experienced healthy activity especially East of Suez. Increased ...
|
|
|
Showing 2931 to 2935 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Planning Commission, India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
