We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 16 July 15
INDONESIA'S HBA HITS ALL-TIME LOW OF $59.16 PER METRIC TON IN JULY 2015
COALspot.com - The Director General of Mineral and Coal of Indonesia revised down Indonesian coal benchmark price once again to US$ 59.16 pe ...
Thursday, 16 July 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS DECLINE W-O-W, M-O-M
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q3' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The Q3 swap was down US$ ...
Wednesday, 15 July 15
WEEKLY SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The last few weeks have been rather strenuous for Greece and China, each for their own reasons, affecting most markets around the world. In Greece ...
Wednesday, 15 July 15
IRAN OIL RECOVERY TO TAKE YEARS, BUT COULD START IN 2016 - FITCH
Iranian crude oil production is likely to increase in 2016 but will take a number of years to reach its previous peak, Fitch Ratings says.
The ...
Wednesday, 15 July 15
SAS TO BUILD 108 KM ROAD FOR COAL IN JAMBI, SAYS JAKARTA POST
Jambi Governor Hasan Basri Agus said on Sunday that mining company PT Sinar Anugerah Sukses (SAS) would develop a 108-kilometer road with a width o ...
|
|
|
Showing 2921 to 2925 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PTC India Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Planning Commission, India
|
| |
| |
|
