We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 07 August 15
COAL PRICE DEVELOPMENTS CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED, SUCCINCTLY AS "OVERSUPPLY MEETS SUBDUED DEMAND" - VDKI
Coal Outlook 2015 – International
Regarding the outlook for global coal trading, two questions arise: firstly, “ whether the years of ...
Friday, 07 August 15
U.S. YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION TOTALED 528.1 MMST; DOWN 8.7% Y/Y - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.7 million shor ...
Thursday, 06 August 15
THE RATES FOR CAPES SHOOT UP LAST WEEK; GIVING THIS RECENT RALLY SOME MUCH NEEDED LEGS - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market noted another positive closing last week, entirely supported by Capesize performance, which managed to balance th ...
Thursday, 06 August 15
HARD COAL AND COKE IMPORTS TO GERMANY REACH NEW ALL-TIME HIGH OF 56.2M TONES IN 2014
Demand for German and imported hard coal In 2014, in 2014 fell by almost 8%, or 4.8m TCE, to 56.2m TCE.
According to German Coal Importer ...
Thursday, 06 August 15
SEABORNE WORLD TRADE IN STEAM COAL GROWS BY 3% YOY - GERMAN COAL IMPORTER ASSOCIATION
Global trade with hard coal, at 1,272m tones in 2014, increased by 35m tonnes or 3% in comparison with the previous year.
According to associa ...
|
|
|
Showing 2881 to 2885 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The University of Queensland
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
