We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 August 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FLAT WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down $ 0.98 per MT (-2.20%) month over month to US$ 43.65 per mt. The swap ...
Tuesday, 11 August 15
GLOBAL PRODUCTION OF CRUDE STEEL REACHED A NEW ALL-TIME HIGH OF 1,661M TONNES IN 2014 - VDKI
COALpot.com: Global production of crude steel reached a new all-time high of 1,661m tonnes in 2014, said German Coal Importer Association, in its l ...
Tuesday, 11 August 15
2016 CFR S.CHINA COAL SWAPS CLOSED SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN 4Q 2015 CLOSING PRICES; BUT NOT SIGNIFICANT
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery declined just US cents 10 (0.20%) per MT month over month.
A commodi ...
Monday, 10 August 15
SOUTH KOREAN UTILITY KOMIPO INVITES BITUMINOUS COAL BIDS FOR BORYEONG POWER PLANT
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender for 560,000 Metric Tons (MT) of 4,600kcal/kg NAR c ...
Sunday, 09 August 15
THE PANAMAX MARKET HAS REMAINED WEAK THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to be buoyant with cape index pushing the BDI.
The BDI was up 10.49% and closed at 1200 points on 7 ...
|
|
|
Showing 2876 to 2880 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- The University of Queensland
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
|
| |
| |
|
