We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the ...
Thursday, 13 August 15
THE RATES FOR CAPES KEPT RALLYING LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: Strong Capesize performance kept supporting the Dry Bulk market last week, which noted another positive weekly closing, while rates f ...
Thursday, 13 August 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS CONTINUE FALLING
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery 4Q' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The 4Q swap was down US$ ...
Wednesday, 12 August 15
DRY BULK MARKET: WITHOUT A DOUBT REACHED HEALTHIER LEVEL
A few weeks before the end of the summer season, the BDI is hovering around 1,200 points, providing some much needed optimism to all Dry Bulk marke ...
Wednesday, 12 August 15
REGULATION CURBS POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN MINING SECTOR IN INDONESIA - FLORENCE G. SANTOSO
The Indonesian Government appears to be getting serious about stripping Regents of the authority to issue mining licenses. The Government took the ...
|
|
|
Showing 2871 to 2875 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The University of Queensland
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Planning Commission, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
