We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 02 March 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP ROSE 6.89% MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 3.35 per MT (+6.89%) month over month and US$ 0.40 (0.78%) week on ...
Sunday, 01 March 15
BDI INDEX SLIGHTLY UP CAUSED AN INCREASE IN THE PANAMAX, SUPARAMAX AND HANDY SIZE INDICES
COALspot.com: The freight market saw some gains this week and BDI was up 5.26 pct closed at 540 points. However the Cape index failed to follow BDI ...
Friday, 27 February 15
WEEKLY US COAL PRODUCTION DOWN AN ESTIMATED 14.0% FROM LAST WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 16.5 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 26 February 15
DRY BULK MARKET COULD REBOUND FROM HISTORICAL LOWS IN THE COMING WEEKS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market could exit from its historical lows in the coming weeks, as Chinese buyers reenter the market after the holiday celebrations. T ...
Thursday, 26 February 15
COAL POLICY RISK: HIGHER ROYALTIES FOR IUP HOLDERS - BAHANA SECURITIES | JAKARTA POST
The Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry plans to raise coal royalties charged to mining operation permit (IUP) holders by the end of the first qu ...
|
|
|
Showing 3171 to 3175 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PTC India Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
